Hemostasis Today

September, 2026
September 2026
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930  
Tareq Abadl: When Good Samples Give Bad Numbers – Spotting EDTA Contamination in the Lab
Sep 13, 2026, 11:26

Tareq Abadl: When Good Samples Give Bad Numbers – Spotting EDTA Contamination in the Lab

Tareq Abadl, Medical Lab Specialist, shared a post on LinkedIn:

“The sample looks perfect… but the results are screaming!

Imagine receiving a properly collected and labeled sample, yet the analyzer reports:

  • Potassium: 8.2 mEq/L
  • Calcium: 2.1 mg/dL

The test is repeated, and the same results appear. Before reporting a critical value, stop and ask:

Could this be EDTA contamination?

EDTA contamination can occur during the pre-analytical phase when potassium-EDTA from a CBC tube contaminates a serum or heparin sample.

The characteristic pattern is:

High Potassium – pseudohyperkalemia
Low Calcium – EDTA binds calcium
Low Magnesium – chelation effect
Low ALP – EDTA interferes by chelating essential metal ions

High K and Low Ca and maybe Low Mg and unexpectedly low ALP means Think EDTA contamination!

Before releasing such results:

  1. Check the Delta Check and previous patient results.
  2. Look for the characteristic biochemical pattern.
  3. Review possible collection or handling errors, including improper order of draw or contamination during collection/processing.
  4. Reject the affected specimen and request a new sample when contamination is suspected.

A functioning analyzer and acceptable QC do not guarantee that every patient result is clinically valid.

True laboratory expertise is not just producing numbers… it is recognizing when a number does not make sense and protecting the patient from a potentially misleading clinical decision.”

Tareq Abadl

Other posts featuring Tareq Abadl on Hemostasis Today.