David Ferreira: Identifying the True Drivers of Recurrent Thrombosis
David Ferreira, President of the General Assembly of APIH, shared a post on LinkedIn:
“Therapeutic anti-Xa.
INR on target.
DOAC in the right dose — and taken.
And yet… new thrombosis.
What now?
Increase hypocoagulation?
Change drugs?
Or stop for 30 seconds to think?
There is a pattern that repeats itself — and is rarely questioned: thrombosis patient – correct hypocoagulation – new thrombosis – escalate or change hypocoagulation.
Three very real examples:
- Sepsis. Activated endothelium, systemic inflammation.
Will it solve with more hypocoagulation? - Lupus Flare/ Immune system in overdrive.
Will it solve with more hypocoagulation? - Catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome (or similar phenotype). Cascading microthrombosis, consumption.
Will it solve with more hypocoagulation?
The problem is not hypoglutilation.
It is the reasoning. We increased doses. We changed drugs.
Because these patients are not thrombosing due to ‘lack of anticoagulant.’
They are thrombosing because:
- Activated endothelium
- High tissue factor
- NETs
- blocked fibrinolysis
In a word – Thrombo-Inflammation!
The system is thus mandatorily programmed to thrombo.
And how do we respond?
More hypocoagulation, hypocoagulant exchange.
This is not therapeutic failure.
It is conceptual failure.
The right question is not ‘What’s the next hypocoagulant?’, but ‘What is fueling this thrombosis?’
And in practice, what changes?
Confirm that you are well hypocoagulated.
Search for the driver.
And then act where it matters:
- Sepsis/infection – aggressive focus control
- Active autoimmune disease – immunosuppression (e.g., corticosteroids) plus/minus targeted therapy
- Severe antiphospholipid syndrome – combined approach (hypocoagulation plus immune modulation depending on context)
- Active neoplasm – treat the underlying disease
- Arterial/platelet phenotype – consider antiplatelet therapy (e.g., clopidogrel) in an appropriate context
Hypocoagulation continues.
But it is no longer the center of the strategy.
Because the reality is this:
Hypocoagulation treats the thrombus.
But who decides the outcome… it is inflammation.
If this bothers you, great.
It’s supposed.
At the end of the day, the most important thing about auscultation is not the stethoscope.
It is between the ears of those who wear it.”
Stay updated with Hemostasis Today.
-
Jun 25, 2026, 15:56Wolfgang Miesbach: Building the Future of Gene Therapy – From Centre Readiness to Long-Term Patient Care
-
Jun 25, 2026, 15:46Amber Yates: Making a Meaningful Difference for People Living with Sickle Cell Disease
-
Jun 25, 2026, 15:43Nancy Cavey: Navigating Disability Benefits for Patients with Immune Thrombocytopenia
-
Jun 25, 2026, 15:28Damon Race: Pursuing Long-Term Expression in Hemophilia A Gene Therapy
-
Jun 25, 2026, 15:23Jonas Kingo: ISTH 2026 in Paris Brings the Global Hemostasis Community Together
-
Jun 25, 2026, 15:21Balancing Therapeutic Progress and Emergency Preparedness in Hemophilia – CRH French Reference Center for Hemophilia Lyon
-
Jun 25, 2026, 15:06Ifeanyichukwu Ifechidere: What If One of the Biggest Myth Fact About APS is Hidden in its Name?
-
Jun 25, 2026, 15:05Gopal Patidar: Advancing Haemovigilance and Global Collaboration at ISBT 2026
-
Jun 25, 2026, 14:52Violeta Jardin: Measuring Antifibrinolytic Effect to Improve Tranexamic Acid Safety