Alexsander Santiago: Evaluating Clinical Harm from Missing versus Overdiagnosing HIT
Alexsander Santiago, Health Education Coordinator at Intensive therapy in Foco, shared a post on LinkedIn:
“The platelet fall is the warning.
Thrombosis is the threat.
Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is one of the most paradoxical complications we face in the ICU.
The platelet count falls.
But the patient is not primarily in danger because of bleeding.
The real emergency is an immune-driven, highly prothrombotic state.
Antibodies form against PF4/heparin complexes, activate platelets, amplify thrombin generation and can produce venous or arterial thrombosis.
That is why HIT should never be reduced to ‘thrombocytopenia after heparin.’
In critically ill patients, thrombocytopenia is common.
True HIT is not.
So the challenge is double:
- Miss HIT, then risk catastrophic thrombosis.
- Overdiagnose HIT, theb unnecessary testing, alternative anticoagulation and bleeding risk.
My bedside framework starts with the 4Ts:
1. Thrombocytopenia:
- How much did the platelet count fall?
- A fall >50 percent matters even if the absolute count is not dramatically low.
2. Timing:
- Classic onset is usually 5–14 days after heparin exposure.
- Earlier falls can occur with recent prior exposure.
3. Thrombosis:
- New venous or arterial thrombosis changes the entire picture.
4. Other Causes:
- Sepsis, DIC, drugs, devices, surgery and critical illness itself may explain the platelet fall.
- This is why the 4Ts score matters.
- ASH recommends using it before laboratory testing rather than relying on gestalt alone.
Low probability?
- HIT testing is generally not recommended.
Intermediate or high probability?
- Stop heparin, evaluate with a PF4/heparin immunoassay and, if positive, use a functional assay when available.
And importantly:
‘Stop heparin’ means identifying all relevant sources of heparin, not only the obvious infusion.
Treatment then requires a non-heparin anticoagulant, individualized to thrombosis, bleeding risk, organ function, clinical stability and procedural needs.
One more nuance matters:
- A positive PF4 immunoassay is not automatically HIT.
- Clinical probability and immunologic testing and functional confirmation, when available, belong together.
For me, the principle is simple:
Do not chase the platelet count.
Recognize the thrombotic syndrome.
In a heparin-exposed patient, a new platelet fall should trigger structured reasoning, not panic, and not complacency.
What causes more harm in practice: Missing HIT? Or overdiagnosing it?”

Stay updated with Hemostasis Today.
-
Nov 8, 2026, 19:31Anna Kajaste-Rudnitski: Presenting AAV-Induced p53 Signalling in Human CNS Cells at ESGCT 26
-
Nov 8, 2026, 19:29David McIntosh: Cybersecurity Matters, but Blood Availability Remains the Bigger Challenge
-
Nov 8, 2026, 19:26Wenxue Ma: An Integrative Framework for Macrophage-Mediated Therapeutic Resistance in Cancer
-
Nov 8, 2026, 19:25Yildiz Yigit: Presenting a Polycythemia Vera Case at the MPN Subcommittee Session
-
Nov 8, 2026, 18:56Denis Oduor: Strengthening the Regulation and Delivery of Blood Transfusion and Transplantation Services
-
Nov 8, 2026, 18:28Raghavendra Rao: A Narrative Review on Chronic Venous Disease during Pregnancy
-
Nov 8, 2026, 17:57Dhiren Patel: PLD1-Derived Phospholipids Regulate NAD Kinase and ROS Production in Neutrophils
-
Nov 8, 2026, 17:48Andra T.: What Causes Antiphospholipid Syndrome? – Four Steps, not One Cause
-
Nov 8, 2026, 17:38Nasrin Samadi: Can a Normal Clotting Test Be Misleading?