Heghine Khachatryan: How DOACs Can Cause False-Positive FVIII Inhibitor Results
Heghine Khachatryan, Editor-in-Chief of Hemostasis Today, Head of Hemophilia and Thrombosis Center at Yeolyan Hematology and Oncology Center, shared RPTH‘s post on LinkedIn:
“Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have transformed the prevention and treatment of thrombosis.
However, their presence in plasma can significantly interfere with clot-based laboratory assays, including one of the most critical tests in hemophilia care — the Factor VIII inhibitor assay.
A recent brief report published in Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis highlights an important diagnostic challenge:
DOACs may produce false-positive results in FVIII inhibitor testing, potentially leading to misinterpretation and inappropriate clinical decisions.
The study demonstrates that:
- DOACs interfere with clot-based FVIII inhibitor assays
- The degree of interference varies between agents
- Activated charcoal–based DOAC removal can significantly restore assay reliability
For clinicians and laboratory specialists, this serves as an important reminder:
Accurate inhibitor diagnostics require awareness of anticoagulant interference and appropriate pre-analytical handling of samples.
Strengthening collaboration between clinical hematologists and coagulation laboratories remains essential for precise diagnosis and optimal patient care.”
Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis shared a post on LinkedIn, about a recent article by Rick Timmerije et al, adding:
“Could anticoagulants be quietly distorting one of our most important hemophilia assays?
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are widely used, but they can create a hidden diagnostic trap.
A new RPTH study shows that DOACs can interfere with the factor VIII inhibitor (Nijmegen–Bethesda) assay, producing false-positive inhibitor results that could mislead clinical decisions.
Here’s the key signal:
- All tested DOACs caused concentration-dependent false-positive FVIII inhibitor results.
Dabigatran produced the strongest interference, while apixaban showed the least effect.
Why this matters clinically
- False inhibitor diagnosis
- Unnecessary immunosuppression
- Inappropriate use of bypassing agents
- Delayed recognition of true acquired hemophilia
But there is a practical solution:
Activated charcoal–based DOAC removal restored assay accuracy, bringing inhibitor measurements back within normal assay variability.
Translation:
Sometimes the problem isn’t the patient, it’s the assay.
Big questions for clinicians and labs:
- Should DOAC removal become routine before inhibitor testing?
- How many ‘inhibitors’ might actually be assay interference?
- Do other clot-based assays face similar hidden bias?”
Title: Direct oral anticoagulant interference and removal in the factor VIII inhibitor assay
Authors: Rick Timmerije, Saskia E.M. Schols, Daniëlle Meijer, Wideke Barteling, An K. Stroobants, Sanna R. Rijpma
Read Full Article on RPTH

Othe posts featuring Heghine Khachatryan on Hemostasis Today.
-
Apr 22, 2026, 04:43Ifeanyichukwu Ifechidere: The Critical Role of Calibrator Specificity in Anticoagulation Monitoring
-
Apr 22, 2026, 04:13Ilenia Calcaterra: Clinical Relevance of Persistent Pain in Emicizumab-Treated Haemophilia A
-
Apr 22, 2026, 03:56Annette Bowyer: Reflecting on Progress and Leadership in Laboratory Sciences
-
Apr 21, 2026, 21:07Tareq Abadl: Not Every Low Platelet Count Is True – Check the Smear First
-
Apr 21, 2026, 21:05Beverley Hunt: Honored to Receive the Lifetime Achievement Award at BSH 2026
-
Apr 21, 2026, 21:03Toong Youttananukorn: Proud to Support Data That Drives Action at WFH 2026
-
Apr 21, 2026, 20:48Ney Carter Borges: Endothelial Senescence as a Central Driver of Adipose Dysfunction in Heart Failure and Type 2 Diabetes
-
Apr 21, 2026, 20:29Can Stem Cell-Delivered Platelets Fight Drug-Resistant Bacteria?- RPTH Journal
-
Apr 21, 2026, 18:51WHO Expert Lorenzo Moja Discusses How Essential Medicines Policy Expands Access to Treatment – WFH