A Dickensian Reality: Warfarin Patients Are Treated Like Orphans – Says Pall Onundarson
Pall Onundarson, Professor Emeritus at Landspitali University Hospital, posted on LinkedIn:
”I recently read eye-opening books by Chris Deacon, Jerry Avorn, and John Abramson on corruption in increasingly corporate-driven healthcare systems. This reading makes one point unmistakably clear: advances in health technology now depend largely on a manufacturer’s ability to profit. Improvements to older technologies are suppressed – as though they do not exist – even when patients who could greatly benefit remain. These patients are simply left behind, and regulators make no demands on their behalf.
As the reader may guess, I am referring to patients who still need warfarin (or other VKAs) because newer agents are unsuitable for them. They find themselves in a situation reminiscent of a hungry Oliver Twist in a 19th-century English orphanage pleading, “Please, Sir, I want some more.” These patients are deliberately treated in a Dickensian manner – as burdensome orphans who deserve only minimal servings and no advances.
By 2025, it has become clear that conventionally PT-INR monitored warfarin and other VKAs are still the most effective oral anticoagulants for the most severe thromboembolic conditions (MHV, RHD, APLAS, frail AF, and possibly others). But warfarin management can be made more convenient and outcomes improved. Why, then, are highly effective advances in VKA care met with silence from the owners of the orphanage and their acolytes? Why are the orphans and their caretakers not informed about meaningful improvements, such as more stable or enhanced VKAs? Is it possible that those who profit most simply do not want warfarin management to improve in needy patients?
Early in my career, I believed medicine was guided by well-meaning fiduciaries committed to reducing disability and death. Later, I realized that progress is now permitted mainly when corporate shareholders can maximize profit. Corporations promote newer drugs sold at high prices as being superior to older generics while blocking inexpensive advances that could improve outcomes with those older medications. They appear untroubled if this sacrifices some of the orphans who must still rely on drugs like warfarin – drugs whose management remains suboptimal because meaningful improvements have been suppressed. In this way, the orphans are denied effective, simple, and cost-saving innovations, even at the cost of greater disability and death.”

Keep up with Hemostasis Today.
-
Apr 24, 2026, 23:36Pedro Perez: Are We Measuring the Right Outcomes in VTE?
-
Apr 24, 2026, 20:41Christine Ngaruiya: Malvika Krishnamurthy Highlights Biomarker Gaps in Stroke Research at Stanford Research Symposium
-
Apr 24, 2026, 17:58Erwin Loh: Triple Combination Therapy Shows Major Benefit in Preventing Recurrent Stroke
-
Apr 24, 2026, 17:51Mostafa Faisal Mohammed Saleh: Exploring the Impact of PNH Clones in Aplastic Anemia Across Different Treatment Strategies
-
Apr 24, 2026, 17:35Dawn Faller: Strengthening Global Collaboration in Apheresis at the 2026 ASFA and WAA Joint Meeting
-
Apr 24, 2026, 17:30Omar Adwan: Easy-to-Remember Tips for MCV
-
Apr 24, 2026, 17:07Melissa Hollo: Revolutionizing Diagnostics Through Real-Time Anemia Management at Executive War College
-
Apr 24, 2026, 17:03Oscar William-Donkor: Faith, Blood and Choice
-
Apr 24, 2026, 17:01Julie Rayes: Presenting Our Data at the 12th Symposium on Hemostasis