Hemostasis Today

March, 2026
March 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  
Anu Anna Babu: Which DOAC is Safer for Patients With Acute Venous Thromboembolism?
Mar 26, 2026, 16:56

Anu Anna Babu: Which DOAC is Safer for Patients With Acute Venous Thromboembolism?

Anu Anna Babu, Clinical Pharmacist Intern at Believers Church Medical College Hospital, shared a post on LinkedIn: about a recent article by Lana A. Castellucci et al. published in The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM):

New Evidence in Anticoagulation- Apixaban Vs. Rivaroxaban for VTE

A landmark study just published in The New England Journal of Medicine (March 11, 2026) sheds critical light on a question clinicians face daily: which DOAC is safer for patients with acute Venous Thromboembolism?

The COBRRA trial– the first ever randomized head-to head comparison between the two most prescribed anticoagulants for acute VTE compared bleeding risk between apixaban and rivaroxaban in 2,760 patients across 32 sites in Canada, Australia, and Ireland over a 90-day follow-up period.

Key Findings

  • Rivaroxaban showed a cumulative bleeding rate of 7.1% at 90 days
  • Apixaban showed a significantly lower rate of 3.3% at 90 days
  • This represents a 54% relative reduction in bleeding risk (P < .001)
  • The separation in curves begins early within the first 10-20 days and widens progressively
  • Confidence intervals (shaded regions) confirm this is a robust, statistically meaningful difference

Sample size at Day 0:

  • Rivaroxaban: 1,355 patients
  • Apixaban: 1,345 patients

Both groups remained well-powered throughout the 90-day period, strengthening confidence in these results.

Clinical Takeaway:

When selecting oral anticoagulation therapy for acute VTE, bleeding risk should be a front-and-center consideration. This data suggests apixaban may offer a meaningful safety advantage nearly half the clinically relevant bleeding risk compared to rivaroxaban over 3 months.

Importantly, there was no significant difference in efficacy recurrent clot prevention was comparable between both drugs. So the safety benefit comes without a trade off in effectiveness.

This doesn’t mean one drug is universally superior, patient-specific factors (renal function, dosing adherence, drug interactions, cost) always matter. But this trial adds important real world evidence to guide shared decision making.

Credit: The New England Journal of Medicine NEJM Group, Original Article, March 11, 2026
‘Bleeding Risk with Apixaban vs. Rivaroxaban in Acute Venous Thromboembolism (COBRRA)’

I’m still early in my pharmacy journey would love insights from clinicians and pharmacists who work with these agents daily. What does your practice look like?”

Title: Bleeding Risk with Apixaban vs. Rivaroxaban in Acute Venous Thromboembolism

Authors: Lana A. Castellucci, Vivien M. Chen, Michael J. Kovacs, Alejandro Lazo-Langner, Peter Greenstreet, Susan Kahn, Benoit Côté, Sam Schulman, Kerstin de Wit, James Douketis, Deepa Suryanarayan, Tony Wan, Erik Yeo, Genevieve Le Templier, Huyen A. Tran, Abbey Willcox, Helen J. Crowther, Ritam Prasad, Sudeep Shivakumar, Etimbuk Umana, Fionnuala Ni Ainle, Tobias Tritschler, Stefano Barco, Jean-Philippe Galanaud, Marc Blondon, Lisa Baumann Kreuziger, Susan Solymoss, Clive Kearon, Erin Thomas, Tim Ramsay, Gregoire Le Gal, Marc Rodger

Read the Full Article on The New England Journal of Medicine

Anu Anna Babu

Stay updated on all scientific advances Hemostasis Today.