Time to Integrate Measurement Uncertainty in Hemostasis Assays: RPTH Journal Commentary
Michael Makris, Emeritus Professor of Haemostasis and Thrombosis at the University of Sheffield, Editor-in-Chief of RPTH Journal, posted on LinkedIn:
”Coagulation laboratories should provide a measurement of uncertainty along with each result.
This is an important concept that should have an impact on everybody’s clinical practice.
This commentary in the RPTH Journal is short, succinct and makes the point clearly. It is time that the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) and specifically the scientific and standardisation committees put out a position statement on this.”
Read the commentary here.
Title: Time to integrate measurement uncertainty in method comparison and interpretation of hemostasis laboratory assays
Authors: François Mullier, Isabelle Gouin-Thibault, Piet Meijer, Michael Hardy, Thomas Lecompte
Stay updated with Hemostasis Today.
-
Oct 18, 2026, 17:11Owen McCarty: Understanding Prekallikrein and Its Role in Inflammation and Thrombosis
-
Oct 18, 2026, 17:04Emna Gouider Belhadjali: Don’t Miss GPAS 2026 on Bleeding Disorders
-
Oct 18, 2026, 16:53Mehran Ghasemzadeh: Microparticle-Associated Mitochondrial DNA in Stored Platelet Products
-
Oct 18, 2026, 16:38Edward Lee Carter: A 15-Minute Blood Test for Brain Hemorrhage?
-
Oct 18, 2026, 16:29Patrick Taylor: Oral vs Transdermal Estrogen and Cardiovascular Risk in Menopausal Women
-
Oct 18, 2026, 16:19Artangela Henry: A Meaningful Week at the SCDAA National Convention
-
Oct 18, 2026, 16:04Emília Araújo։ New Insights Into the Genetics of Hemophilia B Leyden
-
Oct 18, 2026, 15:43André Marcel Harris: Award-Winning Research on Texas Sickle Cell Data Collection
-
Oct 18, 2026, 15:21Eleonora Gambineri: First Results of the IEI-Haem Consortium at ESID 2026