Thirunavukkarasu Angappan: Factor VIII and IX Didn’t Get Viral-Safety Rules Until the 1980s
Thirunavukkarasu Angappan, Vice President – Operations and Manufacturing at PopVax, shared a post on LinkedIn:
”Factor VIII and IX Didn’t Get Viral-Safety Rules Until the 1980s. The Hemophilia Community Paid Twice For That Delay.
Heat treatment to kill viruses in blood products has been used since the late 1940s — but only for albumin. As documented in the Penrose Inquiry, manufacturers believed Factor VIII simply couldn’t handle the same heat without losing its clotting power — a real technical problem, not just a missing rule.
As per the same Penrose Inquiry findings, that belief held until the late 1970s, when manufacturers finally worked out how to heat-treat factor concentrates — but the fix came too late for what had already happened.
As reported by the Institute of Medicine and confirmed by the National Bleeding Disorders Foundation, about half of the entire US hemophilia community got infected with HIV between 1981 and 1985, and close to 90% of those with severe hemophilia were infected.
The safety response came in two waves, not one. As mentioned by Applied Clinical Trials, solvent/detergent (S/D) treatment, developed in the 1980s, worked well against HIV, Hepatitis B, and Hepatitis C — but did nothing against non-enveloped viruses like Hepatitis A.
That gap showed up again in the early 1990s, when Hepatitis A outbreaks hit hemophilia patients despite S/D-treated products. As said by Tuna et al. in Annals of Blood, this forced regulators to mandate a second, different safety step — the direct origin of today’s two-step rule.
As per FDA guidance, most plasma products now go through two steps — S/D or heat treatment, plus filtering down to 15–20nm (nanofiltration) — each proven to cut virus levels by more than a 4-log reduction, as per BioProcess International’s viral clearance standards.
This is one of the most important, least talked-about safety systems in biologics manufacturing — built not ahead of time, but because one step failed, and then a second wasn’t enough either.
Since today’s two-step rule only exists because one step alone wasn’t enough, should virus-safety data be shared more openly between the plasma and vaccine industries — or do companies still have good reason to keep it private?”

Stay updated with Hemostasis Today.
-
Sep 9, 2026, 16:00Maximo Agustin Schiavone: HDL Beyond Cholesterol – Linking Lipids and Immunity
-
Sep 9, 2026, 15:56Abdul Mannan: When Antiseizure Drugs Alter DOAC Risk
-
Sep 9, 2026, 15:39Alessandro Lucchesi: The Future of MPN Disease Modification
-
Sep 9, 2026, 15:10Pablo Corral: Is the Lp(a) Hypothesis Wrong?
-
Sep 9, 2026, 14:54Agnes Kisakye: Expanding Point-of-Care Ultrasound and Surgical Interventions for Hemophilia in Uganda
-
Sep 9, 2026, 14:52Jan Sloves: Addressing Diagnostic and Treatment Variability in Pelvic-Origin Varicose Veins
-
Sep 9, 2026, 14:48The French Care Pathway for Gene Therapy in Haemophilia B – CRH French Reference Center for Hemophilia Lyon
-
Sep 9, 2026, 14:43David McIntosh: The Ethics of Plasma Donation
-
Sep 9, 2026, 14:30Alejandro González Veliz: 2026 ESC Guidelines Expand Cardiac Rehabilitation Beyond Post-Event Recovery