Time to Integrate Measurement Uncertainty in Hemostasis Assays: RPTH Journal Commentary
Michael Makris, Emeritus Professor of Haemostasis and Thrombosis at the University of Sheffield, Editor-in-Chief of RPTH Journal, posted on LinkedIn:
”Coagulation laboratories should provide a measurement of uncertainty along with each result.
This is an important concept that should have an impact on everybody’s clinical practice.
This commentary in the RPTH Journal is short, succinct and makes the point clearly. It is time that the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) and specifically the scientific and standardisation committees put out a position statement on this.”
Read the commentary here.
Title: Time to integrate measurement uncertainty in method comparison and interpretation of hemostasis laboratory assays
Authors: François Mullier, Isabelle Gouin-Thibault, Piet Meijer, Michael Hardy, Thomas Lecompte
Stay updated with Hemostasis Today.
-
Aug 26, 2026, 15:48Melissa Hollo: Postpartum Depression is More Than the “Baby Blues”
-
Aug 26, 2026, 15:46Raghavendra Rao: The Link Between Neuropathy and Chronic Venous Disease
-
Aug 26, 2026, 15:43Laurent Bertoletti: Long Term Benefits and Safety of Rehabilitation in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
-
Aug 26, 2026, 15:41Tamer Hellou: Chromosome 1q Gain Signals High Long-Term Risk in AL Amyloidosis
-
Aug 26, 2026, 15:04Sequential Efgartigimod and Eltrombopag Achieve Durable Response in Refractory ITP – Platelets Journal
-
Aug 26, 2026, 14:46Holly O’Byrne: A Framework for Developing and Managing Prehospital Blood Programs
-
Aug 26, 2026, 14:32Eleftherios Mylonakis: Earlier Intervention, Better Risk Stratification, Stronger BP Control
-
Aug 26, 2026, 14:32Bringing ISTH 2026 Research to the Global Scientific Community
-
Aug 26, 2026, 14:23Joseph R. Shaw: Thrombin Generation and the Pharmacodynamics of Oral Anticoagulants