Time to Integrate Measurement Uncertainty in Hemostasis Assays: RPTH Journal Commentary
Michael Makris, Emeritus Professor of Haemostasis and Thrombosis at the University of Sheffield, Editor-in-Chief of RPTH Journal, posted on LinkedIn:
”Coagulation laboratories should provide a measurement of uncertainty along with each result.
This is an important concept that should have an impact on everybody’s clinical practice.
This commentary in the RPTH Journal is short, succinct and makes the point clearly. It is time that the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) and specifically the scientific and standardisation committees put out a position statement on this.”
Read the commentary here.
Title: Time to integrate measurement uncertainty in method comparison and interpretation of hemostasis laboratory assays
Authors: François Mullier, Isabelle Gouin-Thibault, Piet Meijer, Michael Hardy, Thomas Lecompte
Stay updated with Hemostasis Today.
-
Feb 23, 2026, 13:53Rare Diseases, Plasma-Derived Medicines and the Elephant in the Room – Part 1
-
Feb 23, 2026, 13:02Deepak Yadav: What 2025 Evidence Tells Us About Stroke Care
-
Feb 23, 2026, 12:55Radoslaw Kaczmarek: Will AAV Gene Therapy for Hemophilia Trigger Tumorigenesis?
-
Feb 23, 2026, 12:46Heghine Khachatryan: More Granular Risk Stratification Framework for PE from The New 2026 AHA/ACC Guideline
-
Feb 23, 2026, 12:37Reza Shojaei: EU’s Critical Medicines Act and Plasma Resilience
-
Feb 23, 2026, 12:32Anirban Sen Gupta: Emily Mihalko Highlights PlateChek at MTEC
-
Feb 23, 2026, 12:25Ryan Williams: Excellent Highlights on The Heterogeneity of PRP Preparation
-
Feb 23, 2026, 12:10Peter Libby: hsCRP May Select Patients Who Can Benefit From Statins or Anti-inflammatory Therapy
-
Feb 23, 2026, 12:02Marios Georgakis: An Unprecedented for An Antithrombotic Therapy from OCEANIC-STROKE Trial