Filippo Cademartiri: Mandatory Reading for Anyone Who Mistakes Expertise for Certainty
Filippo Cademartiri, Consultant Advanced Cardiovascular Imaging at UPMC Salvator Mundi International Hospital, shared a post on X about an article by Martin Schwartz, published in Journal of Cell Science that has been, adding:
“This article should be mandatory reading for every medical student, PhD candidate, researcher – and honestly, for anyone who mistakes expertise for certainty.
‘The importance of stupidity in scientific research’ sounds provocative, almost offensive.
But Martin Schwartz is not glorifying incompetence.
He is describing the real operating system of discovery.
Science is not built on knowing.
Science is built on tolerating not knowing.
That distinction matters.
Most of education rewards correctness.
School teaches us to answer.
Exams reward speed, certainty, and precision.
You feel intelligent when you get things right.
Research is the opposite.
Real research begins exactly where competence ends – at the frontier where nobody knows the answer, including the people you thought must know.
That moment is psychologically brutal.
You ask the expert.
The expert shrugs.
You assume you’re missing something.
Then you realize: no – this is the work.
You are not failing.
You are standing at the actual boundary of knowledge.
That feeling – ‘I must be stupid’ – is often not a sign of inadequacy.
It is often the first sign that you are finally asking an important question.
Medicine struggles with this.
We train doctors to avoid uncertainty, to fear being wrong, to perform confidence.
But the best clinicians and the best scientists know how to sit inside ambiguity without collapsing into fake certainty.
This is why AI in medicine also deserves caution.
Systems trained only to reproduce established answers may become extraordinarily good at passing exams while being terrible at discovering what matters next.
Guideline intelligence is not the same as scientific intelligence.
Discovery requires productive stupidity:
- the willingness to stay with the uncomfortable
- to look ignorant
- to ask naïve questions
- to be wrong repeatedly without protecting your ego
Most people want the authority of expertise.
Very few want the humiliation required to earn it.
But progress lives there.
- Not in certainty.
- Not in performance.
- Not in sounding smart.
In the quiet discipline of saying: ‘I don’t know… yet.’
And continuing anyway.”
Title: The importance of stupidity in scientific research
Authors: Martin A Schwartz
Stay updated on all scientific advances with Hemostasis Today.
-
Apr 29, 2026, 05:55On Hemophilia Care Advances, Collaboration and Access in India at IHC X 2026 – Hemophilia Federation India
-
Apr 29, 2026, 05:46Rajendra Tapadia: Strengthening Last-Mile Hemophilia Care Through Structured Community Outreach
-
Apr 29, 2026, 05:37Masoabi Sefojane: Whose Realities Shape Global Priorities in Hemophilia Care?
-
Apr 29, 2026, 02:52Fengqian Chen: Another Reality Check for the Factor XI Inhibitor Race – Novartis’ Abelacimab Setback
-
Apr 29, 2026, 02:18Arnaud Baldivia: Peri-Procedural Stroke – An Underestimated Emergency in the Operating Room and in the ICU
-
Apr 29, 2026, 02:04Yazhini Selvaraj: What is Plasmapheresis?
-
Apr 29, 2026, 01:48Ushama Pj: Vitamin K – From ICU Emergencies to Long-Term Health
-
Apr 29, 2026, 01:15Yuriy Prokopenko: Honored to Attend the 12th Symposium on Hemostasis
-
Apr 28, 2026, 16:26Andrew Zapfel: The ASH’s Consortium on Newborn Screening in Africa Brought Together Over 40 People From 10 Countries