Hemostasis Today

November, 2026
November 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30  
Ney Carter Borges: Vulnerable Plaque – Imaging and Clinical Significance
Nov 14, 2026, 09:30

Ney Carter Borges: Vulnerable Plaque – Imaging and Clinical Significance

Ney Carter Borges, Member Cardiologist of Global Physician Association at Cleveland Clinic Florida, shared a post on LinkedIn:

“Vulnerable Plaque: Imaging and Clinical Significance

Vulnerable plaque describes atherosclerotic lesions with features that may favor disruption and thrombosis, regardless of severe luminal narrowing.

Large lipid-rich cores, thin fibrous caps, and inflammation are classic findings; rupture, erosion, or calcified nodules may trigger events.

Many plaque disruptions remain silent, heal, and contribute to lesion growth, so vulnerability does not mean an imminent infarction.

Imaging is complementary.

CCTA noninvasively depicts plaque burden, low attenuation, and remodeling; OCT uses light to assess the cap and surface; IVUS uses ultrasound to measure plaque burden and vessel remodeling; NIRS quantifies lipid content, often with IVUS; ¹⁸F-NaF PET highlights active microcalcification.

Except CCTA and PET, these require an intracoronary catheter; none precisely predicts which plaque will cause an event.

SCOT-HEART, PROSPECT II, and CLIMA linked imaging features to events, but individual prediction remains limited.

PRE¹⁸FFIR showed secondary prognostic associations, while its primary composite outcome was not significant.

Management centers on intensive lipid lowering and global risk-factor control.

PREVENT supports preventive PCI in selected patients with FFR-negative lesions and multiple high-risk features; it does not justify routine screening or stenting of all vulnerable plaques.

Its two-year composite was 0.4% versus 3.4%.

Imaging should guide interpretation, not replace assessment of atherosclerotic risk.”

Ney Carter Borges

Other posts featuring Ney Carter Borges on Hemostasis Today.