GARDEN (Global Hematological Rare Diseases Alliance)/LinkedIn
May 23, 2026, 14:42
How Should Evidence Be Interpreted in Modern Hemophilia Care? – GARDEN
GARDEN (Global Hematological Rare Diseases Alliance) shared a post on LinkedIn:
“How should evidence be interpreted in modern hemophilia care?
In this new contribution from the GARDEN editorial series, Prof. Cedric Hermans explores the methodological debate behind international hemophilia guidelines, examining the balance between randomized clinical trials, real-world evidence, and patient-centered decision-making.
A critical reflection on how evidence shapes clinical practice, access to care, and the future of hemophilia management.”
Stay updated with Hemostasis Today.
-
Oct 18, 2026, 23:31Rana Al-Hrout: MAHA – More Than Schistocytes
-
Oct 18, 2026, 17:11Owen McCarty: Understanding Prekallikrein and Its Role in Inflammation and Thrombosis
-
Oct 18, 2026, 17:04Emna Gouider Belhadjali: Don’t Miss GPAS 2026 on Bleeding Disorders
-
Oct 18, 2026, 16:53Mehran Ghasemzadeh: Microparticle-Associated Mitochondrial DNA in Stored Platelet Products
-
Oct 18, 2026, 16:38Edward Lee Carter: A 15-Minute Blood Test for Brain Hemorrhage?
-
Oct 18, 2026, 16:29Patrick Taylor: Oral vs Transdermal Estrogen and Cardiovascular Risk in Menopausal Women
-
Oct 18, 2026, 16:19Artangela Henry: A Meaningful Week at the SCDAA National Convention
-
Oct 18, 2026, 16:04Emília Araújo։ New Insights Into the Genetics of Hemophilia B Leyden
-
Oct 18, 2026, 15:43André Marcel Harris: Award-Winning Research on Texas Sickle Cell Data Collection