Jared Rice: When a Negative DAT Doesn’t Mean the Alloimmune Risk Is Gone
Jared Rice, Nurse Professional Development Specialist at Cleveland Clinic, shared a post on LinkedIn:
”A neonate is born after receiving multiple transfusions in utero. Hemoglobin looks reasonable. The DAT comes back negative, and it’s tempting to read that as reassurance that the alloimmune process has resolved.
It hasn’t. At this point, the DAT result can be actively misleading, and reading it the wrong way risks missing an infant who is still at real risk from an antibody that hasn’t gone anywhere.
A similar disconnect shows up with hydrops. Correcting fetal hemoglobin with transfusion doesn’t mean ascites and effusions resolve on the same timeline, because the fluid accumulation traces back to a hepatic mechanism that doesn’t reverse the moment anemia does.
This video works through the full cascade in severe hemolytic disease and erythroblastosis fetalis, from the antibody crossing the placenta to why a corrected hemoglobin and a negative DAT can still leave a critically ill neonate.”
Stay updated with Hemostasis Today.
-
Sep 29, 2026, 11:21Richard Davis: Rapid Rescue in Massive Pulmonary Embolism
-
Sep 29, 2026, 11:14Nissan Brown: Every Step Counts for the Hemophilia Community
-
Sep 29, 2026, 11:03Zain Khalpey: SINGLE AF Adds New Evidence to the Anticoagulation Debate
-
Sep 29, 2026, 10:54How Does Haemophilia Affect Motor Development in Infants? – EAHAD
-
Sep 29, 2026, 10:49Alison Davey: The Vital Role of Community Support in Bleeding Disorders
-
Sep 29, 2026, 10:36Abdul Muqtadir Abbasi: 5 Questions to Ask When the CBC Is Abnormal
-
Sep 29, 2026, 10:28Manu Morales Sánchez: DOACs in Intermediate Risk Atrial Fibrillation
-
Sep 29, 2026, 09:59William Sauer: Ablation in Patients With LAAO Devices
-
Sep 29, 2026, 03:53Nahrwan Masaoodi: Iron Deficiency Can Exist Without Anemia