Simon Senanu: ‘Within Range’ Is Not the Same as ‘Safe’ in Laboratory Medicine
Simon Senanu, Medical Laboratory Scientist at Perkins Medical Centre, shared a post on LinkedIn.
“The Most Dangerous ‘Normal’ Lab Results – When ‘Within Range’ Is Not the Same as ‘Safe’
Some of the most dangerous lab results are… normal.
Because normal ranges don’t know:
- the patient
- the timeline
- the clinical context
‘Normal’ Creatinine
What the lab shows: Creatinine within reference range.
What may be happening:
- Early acute kidney injury
- Significant renal loss in elderly or low-muscle patients
Clinical insight: Creatinine rises late. A ‘normal’ value can mask up to 50% loss of kidney function.
Always interpret with:
- age
- muscle mass
- urine output
- and trend
‘Normal’ Hemoglobin (Hb)
What the lab shows: Hb within reference range.
What may be happening:
- Acute blood loss
- Hemodilution not yet reflected
Clinical insight: Hemoglobin does not fall immediately after acute bleeding.
A normal Hb does not rule out hemorrhage in the first 24 hours.
‘Normal’ White Blood Cell Count (WBC)
What the lab shows: Total WBC within range.
What may be happening:
- Sepsis (especially in elderly, neonates, immunocompromised)
Clinical insight: Sepsis can exist with a normal WBC.
Differential count, CRP, procalcitonin, and clinical signs matter more.
‘Normal’ Troponin
What the lab shows: Troponin not elevated.
What may be happening:
- Early myocardial infarction
- Unstable angina
Clinical insight: Troponin elevation is time-dependent.
A single normal troponin does not exclude ACS – serial testing is essential.
‘Normal’ Sodium
What the lab shows: Sodium within reference range.
What may be happening:
- Rapid correction of previous hyponatremia or hypernatremia
Clinical insight: The rate of change is often more dangerous than the value itself.
Normal today doesn’t mean safe yesterday.
‘Normal’ INR
What the lab shows: INR within range.
What may be happening:
- High bleeding risk due to thrombocytopenia
- Liver disease with balanced factor loss
Clinical insight: INR measures one part of hemostasis.
Normal INR does not mean normal clotting.
Clinical Reality
Reference ranges describe populations – not patients.
‘Normal’ values can still hide:
- early disease
- rapid deterioration
- life-threatening pathology
Pro Tip
Always ask:
- Is this the right time?
- Is this the right patient?
- Is this the right trend?
Single numbers mislead. Patterns save lives.
Which ‘normal’ lab result has caused the most harm in your clinical experience?”
Stay updated with Hemostasis Today.
-
Feb 13, 2026, 12:35Heghine Khachatryan: Advances in Targeted Therapy Transforming TTP Management at ASH Highlights 2026
-
Feb 13, 2026, 12:03Prabineshwor Prasad Lekhak: Saving a Girl with Hemophilia When Every Drop Counts
-
Feb 13, 2026, 11:37Finn Guo: Access and Affordability Challenges for Von Willebrand Disease in China
-
Feb 13, 2026, 11:31Sami Maja: I Presented My Master’s Thesis on Venous Occlusion Plethysmography at LFT Days 2026
-
Feb 13, 2026, 11:25Salar Mousa: Effect of COVID-19 on Initiation of Antithrombotic Therapy Post-Stroke in Sweden
-
Feb 13, 2026, 11:21Matías J Alet Joins The Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases as Section Editor
-
Feb 13, 2026, 11:17Wolfgang Miesbach: Sophie Susen’s ”Long‑Term Prophylaxis in VWD” Talk at EAHAD 2026
-
Feb 13, 2026, 11:06Jennifer Beauchamp: Early Stroke Sign and Symptom Recognition Tool Developed by UTHealth Houston
-
Feb 13, 2026, 11:00Christoph B. Olivier: Can We Stay Ahead of Valve Thrombosis?