Pall T. Onundarson on Correlation Between Plasma Levels of DOACs and Both Thromboembolic and Bleeding Events
Pall T. Onundarson, Professor Emeritus at Landspitali University Hospital, shared on LinkedIn:
”In the May 2025 issue of JTH, Cosmo Godino and colleagues from Milan report a strong correlation between plasma levels of four DOACs and both thromboembolic and bleeding events.
Their findings reveal a U-shaped relationship, reminiscent of what older physicians recall from the warfarin era.
The authors conclude that monitoring DOAC levels and adjusting doses could improve outcomes for at least some patients.
When DOACs were introduced about 20 years ago, many in the thrombosis community were skeptical of the “no monitoring” strategy.
Nevertheless, manufacturers advanced this approach to emphasize the convenience of DOACs over low-cost, PT-monitored warfarin and other VKAs.
The new data suggest that outcomes with DOACs might improve if doses were tailored to individual patients – something current fixed tablet sizes largely prevent.
But tailoring of DOACs would effectively reintroduce the hallmarks of warfarin therapy: monitoring, dose adjustment by professionals, or self-management with point-of-care devices.
While such a shift might be beneficial, it would also add cost and inconvenience to DOAC use, potentially making warfarin more competitive again!
Importantly, warfarin monitoring and dosing has itself improved although rarely mentioned.
As an example, three clinical studies have shown that Fiix-monitored warfarin reduces thromboembolism by about 50%, along with reduced monitoring frequency and dose adjustments, compared with conventional PT-based warfarin management. Emerging evidence further suggests that Fiix-warfarin achieves similar outcome advantages when compared with apixaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran.
The next step must be be independent studies directly comparing tailored DOAC therapy against standard fixed-dose DOAC regimens and prefarably against the improved Fiix-monitored warfarin as well. The results could reshape how these drugs are positioned relative to warfarin.
In short: Bringing monitoring and improved dose tailoring back is good for patients.”
Stay updated on all scientific advances with Hemostasis Today.
-
Mar 12, 2026, 20:44Honoring Marion Stolte’s Lasting Impact on the Bleeding Disorders Community – WFH
-
Mar 12, 2026, 20:37Paul Riley: Is Thrombin Generation Assay Ready for Prime Time?
-
Mar 12, 2026, 20:28Rob Maloney: Building Visibility for Bleeding Disorders in Rural Georgia
-
Mar 12, 2026, 20:19Akshat Jain: Validating Oral Pain Medication Use as a Global Marker in Sickle Cell Disease
-
Mar 12, 2026, 20:13Michael Makris: Early Clinical Results of AAV8-BDD FVIII Gene Therapy in Hemophilia A
-
Mar 12, 2026, 20:02Wolfgang Miesbach: From Heparin to Vaccines – The Expanding Biology of Anti-PF4 Immunothrombosis
-
Mar 12, 2026, 19:56Christophe Dubois: Celebrating Nicolas Gendron’s HDR Defense and Future in Hemostasis
-
Mar 12, 2026, 17:06Caitlin Raymond: Managing Crigler–Najjar Syndrome Type 1 Crisis Without a Standard TPE Protocol
-
Mar 12, 2026, 17:03Jan Sloves: Insights on Comprehensive Venous Duplex Imaging at VEITH Symposium 2025