Pall T. Onundarson on Correlation Between Plasma Levels of DOACs and Both Thromboembolic and Bleeding Events
Pall T. Onundarson, Professor Emeritus at Landspitali University Hospital, shared on LinkedIn:
”In the May 2025 issue of JTH, Cosmo Godino and colleagues from Milan report a strong correlation between plasma levels of four DOACs and both thromboembolic and bleeding events.
Their findings reveal a U-shaped relationship, reminiscent of what older physicians recall from the warfarin era.
The authors conclude that monitoring DOAC levels and adjusting doses could improve outcomes for at least some patients.
When DOACs were introduced about 20 years ago, many in the thrombosis community were skeptical of the “no monitoring” strategy.
Nevertheless, manufacturers advanced this approach to emphasize the convenience of DOACs over low-cost, PT-monitored warfarin and other VKAs.
The new data suggest that outcomes with DOACs might improve if doses were tailored to individual patients – something current fixed tablet sizes largely prevent.
But tailoring of DOACs would effectively reintroduce the hallmarks of warfarin therapy: monitoring, dose adjustment by professionals, or self-management with point-of-care devices.
While such a shift might be beneficial, it would also add cost and inconvenience to DOAC use, potentially making warfarin more competitive again!
Importantly, warfarin monitoring and dosing has itself improved although rarely mentioned.
As an example, three clinical studies have shown that Fiix-monitored warfarin reduces thromboembolism by about 50%, along with reduced monitoring frequency and dose adjustments, compared with conventional PT-based warfarin management. Emerging evidence further suggests that Fiix-warfarin achieves similar outcome advantages when compared with apixaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran.
The next step must be be independent studies directly comparing tailored DOAC therapy against standard fixed-dose DOAC regimens and prefarably against the improved Fiix-monitored warfarin as well. The results could reshape how these drugs are positioned relative to warfarin.
In short: Bringing monitoring and improved dose tailoring back is good for patients.”
Stay updated on all scientific advances with Hemostasis Today.
-
Feb 22, 2026, 14:16Ilenia Calcaterra: From Representation to Intellectual Independence in Women in Science
-
Feb 22, 2026, 13:27Pete Stibbs: New AHA and ACC PE Guidelines Finally Align with Real Clinical Practice
-
Feb 22, 2026, 10:39Tagreed Alkaltham: Fibrinogen Concentrate Is a Deliberate Clinical Choice in Acute Bleeding
-
Feb 22, 2026, 09:38Abdulrahman Nasiri: Significant Shifts In The 2026 AHA/ACC Guidelines for Acute Pulmonary Embolism
-
Feb 22, 2026, 09:22Shiny K. Kajal: Not All Transfusion Reactions Are Immunohematologic Incompatibilities
-
Feb 22, 2026, 09:12Arun V J։ The Hidden Risks in Every Blood Bag
-
Feb 22, 2026, 08:56Parandzem Khachatryan։ How Hard Is It to Be a Mom, a Wife, a Professor, and a Doctor All at Once?
-
Feb 22, 2026, 08:46Anirban Sen Gupta Presents Bioinspired Platelet Surrogates at MTEC
-
Feb 22, 2026, 08:31Heghine Khachatryan: Advancing Care for Women and Girls with Bleeding Disorders is A Matter of Equity