Time to Integrate Measurement Uncertainty in Hemostasis Assays: RPTH Journal Commentary
Michael Makris, Emeritus Professor of Haemostasis and Thrombosis at the University of Sheffield, Editor-in-Chief of RPTH Journal, posted on LinkedIn:
”Coagulation laboratories should provide a measurement of uncertainty along with each result.
This is an important concept that should have an impact on everybody’s clinical practice.
This commentary in the RPTH Journal is short, succinct and makes the point clearly. It is time that the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) and specifically the scientific and standardisation committees put out a position statement on this.”
Read the commentary here.
Title: Time to integrate measurement uncertainty in method comparison and interpretation of hemostasis laboratory assays
Authors: François Mullier, Isabelle Gouin-Thibault, Piet Meijer, Michael Hardy, Thomas Lecompte
Stay updated with Hemostasis Today.
-
Apr 10, 2026, 18:22Chris Hillis: Reflections on My Term as President of the Canadian Hematology Society
-
Apr 10, 2026, 17:59Michelle Leona Cecil: Representing Microhealth at The Coalition for Hemophilia B Annual Symposium
-
Apr 10, 2026, 17:47Lucie Raskin: Comparing VTE Risk in Hormonal Contraceptives at NTHC 2026
-
Apr 10, 2026, 17:39Diverse Voices But Shared Mission – Day 1 of EHC Youth Leadership Workshop
-
Apr 10, 2026, 17:30Make Your Mark at the World Stroke Congress 2026 – World Stroke Organization
-
Apr 10, 2026, 17:23Sofie Abels: Implications for Targeted Screening for Thrombophilia in Young Stroke Patients
-
Apr 10, 2026, 17:08Armghan Ans: 3 Questions Worth Sitting with If You Work in Stroke AI
-
Apr 10, 2026, 17:03William Wallace: Vitamin C Is More Than ”Immune Support”
-
Apr 10, 2026, 16:58Wolfgang Miesbach: Greater Symptom Burden in Women with Bleeding Disorders – Insights from Irish Data