Time to Integrate Measurement Uncertainty in Hemostasis Assays: RPTH Journal Commentary
Michael Makris, Emeritus Professor of Haemostasis and Thrombosis at the University of Sheffield, Editor-in-Chief of RPTH Journal, posted on LinkedIn:
”Coagulation laboratories should provide a measurement of uncertainty along with each result.
This is an important concept that should have an impact on everybody’s clinical practice.
This commentary in the RPTH Journal is short, succinct and makes the point clearly. It is time that the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) and specifically the scientific and standardisation committees put out a position statement on this.”
Read the commentary here.
Title: Time to integrate measurement uncertainty in method comparison and interpretation of hemostasis laboratory assays
Authors: François Mullier, Isabelle Gouin-Thibault, Piet Meijer, Michael Hardy, Thomas Lecompte
Stay updated with Hemostasis Today.
-
Oct 9, 2026, 13:11Ayshathul Noora։ Carbetocin vs Oxytocin in Preventing Postpartum Hemorrhage
-
Oct 9, 2026, 13:07The Rebalanced Patient: New Therapies and New Thrombotic Risks in Hemophilia
-
Oct 9, 2026, 12:48Santiago Cepeda Chafla: CereBleed Simplifies Brain Hemorrhage Assessment
-
Oct 9, 2026, 12:34Abdul Muqtadir Abbasi: Pancytopenia Is a Finding, Not a Diagnosis
-
Oct 9, 2026, 12:24Mercy Lung’aho: When Diet Quality and Nutritional Biomarkers Tell Different Stories
-
Oct 9, 2026, 12:22Eugene Fan: Bridging Therapeutic Breakthroughs and Equitable Thalassaemia Care
-
Oct 9, 2026, 12:14Brittany Busse: A New Focus on Iron Deficiency Before Anemia
-
Oct 9, 2026, 12:13Akshat Jain: A New Textbook Bringing Global Perspectives on Sickle Cell Disease
-
Oct 9, 2026, 12:03Heather Case: Bridging Awareness and Action in Women’s Hemophilia Care