Time to Integrate Measurement Uncertainty in Hemostasis Assays: RPTH Journal Commentary
Michael Makris, Emeritus Professor of Haemostasis and Thrombosis at the University of Sheffield, Editor-in-Chief of RPTH Journal, posted on LinkedIn:
”Coagulation laboratories should provide a measurement of uncertainty along with each result.
This is an important concept that should have an impact on everybody’s clinical practice.
This commentary in the RPTH Journal is short, succinct and makes the point clearly. It is time that the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) and specifically the scientific and standardisation committees put out a position statement on this.”
Read the commentary here.
Title: Time to integrate measurement uncertainty in method comparison and interpretation of hemostasis laboratory assays
Authors: François Mullier, Isabelle Gouin-Thibault, Piet Meijer, Michael Hardy, Thomas Lecompte
Stay updated with Hemostasis Today.
-
May 26, 2026, 16:45Ashley George: Take the Leap for Thrombosis UK
-
May 26, 2026, 16:40Hamed Helisaz: Machine Learning for Detecting Missing Heart Medications
-
May 26, 2026, 15:32Haroun Gajraj: Brown Marks After Microsclerotherapy – What Every Practitioner Needs to Know
-
May 26, 2026, 15:29Jacqueline van Paassen: Lack of Essential Clinical Data in DOAC Prescriptions in Community Pharmacies
-
May 26, 2026, 15:22Shazmah Shaikh: One Visual Guide to Understand All Major Anticoagulants
-
May 26, 2026, 14:39Chidinma Favour։ Welcome to Day 25 of My 31-Day Stroke Awareness Series
-
May 26, 2026, 14:35Novel Insights Into Congenital and Acquired Coagulopathies – ICHCC
-
May 26, 2026, 14:24Fernanda Orsi: The Growing Impact of Hematology Research in Latin America
-
May 26, 2026, 14:23Rense Buijvoets: What If Clots Could Be Treated Exactly Where They Form?