Time to Integrate Measurement Uncertainty in Hemostasis Assays: RPTH Journal Commentary
Michael Makris, Emeritus Professor of Haemostasis and Thrombosis at the University of Sheffield, Editor-in-Chief of RPTH Journal, posted on LinkedIn:
”Coagulation laboratories should provide a measurement of uncertainty along with each result.
This is an important concept that should have an impact on everybody’s clinical practice.
This commentary in the RPTH Journal is short, succinct and makes the point clearly. It is time that the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) and specifically the scientific and standardisation committees put out a position statement on this.”
Read the commentary here.
Title: Time to integrate measurement uncertainty in method comparison and interpretation of hemostasis laboratory assays
Authors: François Mullier, Isabelle Gouin-Thibault, Piet Meijer, Michael Hardy, Thomas Lecompte
Stay updated with Hemostasis Today.
-
Aug 26, 2026, 15:04Sequential Efgartigimod and Eltrombopag Achieve Durable Response in Refractory ITP – Platelets Journal
-
Aug 26, 2026, 14:46Holly O’Byrne: A Framework for Developing and Managing Prehospital Blood Programs
-
Aug 26, 2026, 14:32Eleftherios Mylonakis: Earlier Intervention, Better Risk Stratification, Stronger BP Control
-
Aug 26, 2026, 14:32Bringing ISTH 2026 Research to the Global Scientific Community
-
Aug 26, 2026, 14:18Thomas Dayspring: Prognostic Impact of Lp(a) Changes Following Statin Therapy in Patients with CAD
-
Aug 26, 2026, 14:17Khurram Nasir: Are We Debating the Wrong Thing About Research in Medical Training?
-
Aug 26, 2026, 14:15Nathan Connell: Why Format Free Publishing Still Demands Formatting?
-
Aug 26, 2026, 14:14Reza Shojaei: China’s Reliance on Imported Albumin Raises Global Plasma Security Concerns
-
Aug 26, 2026, 14:03Ahmad Masri: The Amyloid Depleter Revolution in ATTR-CM