Bruno Odisio: Ablation Margins Are Software-Dependent
Bruno Odisio, Professor – Interventional Radiology at MD Anderson Cancer Center, shared on LinkedIn:
”Ablation margins are software-dependent.
Using 15M in-silico simulations, Iwan Paolucci demonstrated that the 5-mm A0 rule is reliable only when ablation confirmation software achieves ≤3-mm segmentation/registration error.
Implications:
– Do not assume a universal 5-mm A0 margin is reliable across all ablation confirmation platforms.
– Interpret margins in the context of software performance, particularly segmentation and registration accuracy.”
Read the full article here.
Article: The effects of measurement errors on minimum ablative margins after thermal ablation of liver tumors: a simulation study
Authors: Iwan Paolucci, Jessica Albuquerque, Noreen S. Siddiqi, A. Kyle Jones, Kristy K. Brock, Bruno C. Odisio
Stay updated on all scientific advances with Hemostasis Today.
-
Sep 16, 2026, 10:15Massimiliano Camilli: Mechanistic Insights Into Cardiovascular Risk Across Androgen Deprivation Therapies
-
Sep 16, 2026, 09:57Nathan Connell: A Regional Approach to Advancing Contemporary Hemophilia A Care
-
Sep 16, 2026, 09:20Mengistu Abate Belay: Bridging the Gap in Anemia Prevention During Pregnancy
-
Sep 16, 2026, 09:09Younes Kalakhy: When Normal Coagulation Tests Miss von Willebrand Disease
-
Sep 16, 2026, 09:00Test Your Knowledge of Warm Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia – ASH Education
-
Sep 16, 2026, 08:28Jean Nakhle: Uncovering How Excess Cysteine Drives Cell Death
-
Sep 16, 2026, 08:20Heghine Khachatryan: Arterial and Venous Thrombosis May Require Different Approaches in Neonates
-
Sep 16, 2026, 07:57Tammuella Chrisentery-Singleton: Standing on the Shoulders of Giants in Hemophilia Care
-
Sep 16, 2026, 07:33Jakob Werner Hansen: Nordic VEX AZA Trial Reaches an Important Milestone