Bruno Odisio: Ablation Margins Are Software-Dependent
Bruno Odisio, Professor – Interventional Radiology at MD Anderson Cancer Center, shared on LinkedIn:
”Ablation margins are software-dependent.
Using 15M in-silico simulations, Iwan Paolucci demonstrated that the 5-mm A0 rule is reliable only when ablation confirmation software achieves ≤3-mm segmentation/registration error.
Implications:
– Do not assume a universal 5-mm A0 margin is reliable across all ablation confirmation platforms.
– Interpret margins in the context of software performance, particularly segmentation and registration accuracy.”
Read the full article here.
Article: The effects of measurement errors on minimum ablative margins after thermal ablation of liver tumors: a simulation study
Authors: Iwan Paolucci, Jessica Albuquerque, Noreen S. Siddiqi, A. Kyle Jones, Kristy K. Brock, Bruno C. Odisio
Stay updated on all scientific advances with Hemostasis Today.
-
Jun 24, 2026, 03:36Ana Pedrero Gil: A New Approach to Post-Tonsillectomy Hemorrhage
-
Jun 24, 2026, 02:59Melissa Hollo: Making Early Anemia Detection the Standard of Care
-
Jun 24, 2026, 02:51Bruno Pougault: The Thin Line Between Bleeding and Clotting
-
Jun 23, 2026, 23:30Shunsuke Iwano: PMDA Introduces Greater Flexibility for Pediatric Factor VIII and IX Development in Japan
-
Jun 23, 2026, 23:05Rounak Dubey: ISBT Academy Session on Agentic AI
-
Jun 23, 2026, 22:59Mohammed Maher Babiker: When ‘Low Platelets’ aren’t Really Low
-
Jun 23, 2026, 22:49Giovanni Merlino: Why Does Stress Hyperglycemia Worsen Stroke Outcomes?
-
Jun 23, 2026, 22:41Tareq Abadl: Coombs Test – The Key to Detecting Immune-Mediated Hemolysis
-
Jun 23, 2026, 22:32How WFH Impacted the Bleeding Disorders Community in 2025