Bruno Odisio: Ablation Margins Are Software-Dependent
Bruno Odisio, Professor – Interventional Radiology at MD Anderson Cancer Center, shared on LinkedIn:
”Ablation margins are software-dependent.
Using 15M in-silico simulations, Iwan Paolucci demonstrated that the 5-mm A0 rule is reliable only when ablation confirmation software achieves ≤3-mm segmentation/registration error.
Implications:
– Do not assume a universal 5-mm A0 margin is reliable across all ablation confirmation platforms.
– Interpret margins in the context of software performance, particularly segmentation and registration accuracy.”
Read the full article here.
Article: The effects of measurement errors on minimum ablative margins after thermal ablation of liver tumors: a simulation study
Authors: Iwan Paolucci, Jessica Albuquerque, Noreen S. Siddiqi, A. Kyle Jones, Kristy K. Brock, Bruno C. Odisio
Stay updated on all scientific advances with Hemostasis Today.
-
Nov 8, 2026, 14:06Shayan Mohammadmoradi: ZEUS Trial-Inflammation Reduction Without Fewer Cardiovascular Events
-
Nov 8, 2026, 14:05Kausik Ray: Plaque-Guided Care for Better Coronary Outcomes
-
Nov 8, 2026, 14:05Athira Elssa Johnson: Understanding Coronary Thrombosis and Its Risks
-
Nov 8, 2026, 14:04Sanjiv Beri: Blood Type Compatibility and the Balance of Giving and Receiving
-
Nov 8, 2026, 14:02Gabriela Hobbs: Recognizing Outstanding Abstract Achievements-ASH 2026
-
Nov 8, 2026, 12:22Marc Carrier: Advancing Catheter-Related Thrombosis Prevention Through Factor XI Inhibition
-
Nov 8, 2026, 11:56Why Genetic Predisposition Does Not Always Lead to Thrombosis – Stork Genetics
-
Nov 8, 2026, 11:45Sher-Lu Pai: Investigating Intracardiac Thrombosis and Its Management in Liver Transplantation
-
Nov 8, 2026, 11:25Mehmet Cilingiroglu: Navigating Anticoagulation Choices in Acute Coronary Syndrome PCI