Bruno Odisio: Ablation Margins Are Software-Dependent
Bruno Odisio, Professor – Interventional Radiology at MD Anderson Cancer Center, shared on LinkedIn:
”Ablation margins are software-dependent.
Using 15M in-silico simulations, Iwan Paolucci demonstrated that the 5-mm A0 rule is reliable only when ablation confirmation software achieves ≤3-mm segmentation/registration error.
Implications:
– Do not assume a universal 5-mm A0 margin is reliable across all ablation confirmation platforms.
– Interpret margins in the context of software performance, particularly segmentation and registration accuracy.”
Read the full article here.
Article: The effects of measurement errors on minimum ablative margins after thermal ablation of liver tumors: a simulation study
Authors: Iwan Paolucci, Jessica Albuquerque, Noreen S. Siddiqi, A. Kyle Jones, Kristy K. Brock, Bruno C. Odisio
Stay updated on all scientific advances with Hemostasis Today.
-
Jan 22, 2026, 15:36We Must Roll Up Our Sleeves And Help: José Antonio García Erce on Plasma Donation
-
Jan 22, 2026, 15:25Nita Radhakrishnan on Challenges In Congenital Afibrinogenemia
-
Jan 22, 2026, 15:10Jin Q Gives a Summary of 2025’s Most Impactful Cell and Gene Therapy Milestones
-
Jan 22, 2026, 14:57Nirav Dhanesha on CD14 Acting As A Functional Driver of DVT
-
Jan 22, 2026, 11:41Jamilla Goedegebuur and Colleagues on VTE Management in Case of PAD
-
Jan 22, 2026, 11:28Abdulrahman Katib on API-CAT Trial’s Evaluation of Apixaban Dosing
-
Jan 22, 2026, 10:38Pedro Perez: The VTE Market Is Clearly Entering Its Next Phase
-
Jan 22, 2026, 10:29Marvin Garcia Reyes Presents a Case of Aorto-Visceral and Aorto-Iliac Thrombosis
-
Jan 22, 2026, 10:16Mohamed Rawy Gives Clinical Tips for Management of Atrial Fibrillation