Hemostasis Today

August, 2026
August 2026
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  
Ons Marsit: Impact of Electroanatomical Mapping on Pentaspline Pulsed Field Ablation
Aug 26, 2026, 16:20

Ons Marsit: Impact of Electroanatomical Mapping on Pentaspline Pulsed Field Ablation

Ons Marsit, Field Clinical Specialist at Boston Scientific, shared a post on LinkedIn about a recent article by Ahmed S Yassin et al., published in EP Europace, adding:

”What does mapping add to Pentaspline PFA-PV isolation?

  • New randomized data from MAP-PFA, recently published in Europace.
  • 32 patients underwent pentaspline PFA with EAM visible vs blinded to the operator.

With mapping:

  • More centered antral lesions: eccentricity index 0.91 vs 1.23 (p=0.039)
  • No increase in procedure time: 59 vs 57 min

There were also numerical trends toward fewer incomplete PVIs (1 vs 4), fewer patients requiring touch-ups (1 vs 3), fewer off-target ablations (0 vs 2) and better flower-configuration spline overlap, although these secondary endpoints were not statistically significant.

Why does this matter?

NAVIGATE-PF Phase 2 reported 95 percent durable PV isolation at 60 days.

MAP-PFA may provide part of the mechanistic explanation behind this durability: more centered antral lesions and potentially better flower-configuration spline overlap — plausible prerequisites for durable isolation.

Whether these acute improvements translate into greater chronic durability and better clinical outcomes remains to be demonstrated.”

Title: Incremental Value of Electroanatomical Mapping During Pentaspline Pulsed Field Pulmonary Vein Isolation: The MAP-PFA Pilot Randomised Trial

Authors: Ahmed S Yassin, Bakhtawar Khan Mahmoodi, Bart A Mulder, Celina V Malyar, Michiel Rienstra, Sing-Chien Yap, Yuri Blaauw

Ons Marsit: Impact of Electroanatomical Mapping on Pentaspline Pulsed Field Ablation

Stay updated on all scientific advances with Hemostasis Today.