Bruno Odisio: Ablation Margins Are Software-Dependent
Bruno Odisio, Professor – Interventional Radiology at MD Anderson Cancer Center, shared on LinkedIn:
”Ablation margins are software-dependent.
Using 15M in-silico simulations, Iwan Paolucci demonstrated that the 5-mm A0 rule is reliable only when ablation confirmation software achieves ≤3-mm segmentation/registration error.
Implications:
– Do not assume a universal 5-mm A0 margin is reliable across all ablation confirmation platforms.
– Interpret margins in the context of software performance, particularly segmentation and registration accuracy.”
Read the full article here.
Article: The effects of measurement errors on minimum ablative margins after thermal ablation of liver tumors: a simulation study
Authors: Iwan Paolucci, Jessica Albuquerque, Noreen S. Siddiqi, A. Kyle Jones, Kristy K. Brock, Bruno C. Odisio
Stay updated on all scientific advances with Hemostasis Today.
-
Jun 27, 2026, 01:31Alessio De Rose: Addressing Micronutrient Deficiencies in the Era of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists
-
Jun 27, 2026, 01:21Michelle Sámano Sánchez: Exploring Vitamin C as an Adjunct Therapy for Anemia in Hemodialysis
-
Jun 27, 2026, 01:08Ana Raquel Gotine: The First Pragmatic Clinical Trial on MNPs and Childhood Anemia in Mozambique
-
Jun 27, 2026, 00:56Sherif Badawy: Reflecting on My Time with ASH CRTI
-
Jun 27, 2026, 00:48Zain Khalpey: Why High quality CPR is Only Part of Successful Cardiac Arrest Management
-
Jun 26, 2026, 22:31Wendy Dusenbury: The New Issue of the Stroke Clinician is Now Live
-
Jun 26, 2026, 20:42Ed Watson: When It Happens to You, Stroke Becomes Personal, Immediate, and Life-Changing
-
Jun 26, 2026, 19:45Nathan Connell: Transforming Surgical Care with Tranexamic Acid
-
Jun 26, 2026, 18:28Daniel Pereira Monteiro: Why Is Beta Thalassaemia Major so Severe?