William Aird: Thinking Before Searching in Clinical Decision Making
William Aird, Professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School, shared a post on LinkedIn:
“Modern clinicians have unprecedented access to evidence.
With a few keystrokes we can pull up continuously updated summaries from resources like UpToDate, DynaMed, or newer AI-assisted tools.
These platforms are extraordinary.
But they answer questions.
They do not determine which question should be asked.
Clinical reasoning begins earlier:
- Orientation.
- Thinking.
- Execution.
Evidence belongs primarily in the last.
In a new essay on The Blood Project – Thinking Before Searching – I explore why searching too early can actually distort clinical reasoning and why the most important educational task today may be teaching trainees how to frame the question before they search for the answer.
Evidence can guide action.
Thinking must guide evidence.”
Other posts featuring on William Aird Hemostasis Today.
-
Jul 14, 2026, 15:27Dianne E Van Der Wal: Celebrating Scientific Contributions at ISTH 2026
-
Jul 14, 2026, 15:13Alfonso Tafur: RIETE Registry Analysis Supports More Equitable Approaches to VTE Care
-
Jul 14, 2026, 15:03Heghine Khachatryan: Phase III Trial Results Support BAFF-R Inhibition in Corticosteroid-Refractory ITP
-
Jul 14, 2026, 14:51Nathan Connell: ISTH 2026 Highlights the Power of Lifelong Collaboration
-
Jul 14, 2026, 14:42Wolfgang Miesbach: VOYAGER1 Highlights Progress Toward Injection-Free Care in Hemophilia A
-
Jul 14, 2026, 12:08Elvira Grandone: Finding the Right LMWH Dose for Pregnant Patients Suffering From DVT
-
Jul 14, 2026, 12:05Eloïse Laouenan: From Washington to Paris – Join GETBO at ISTH 2026
-
Jul 14, 2026, 12:02Louise St. Germain Bannon: Our first ISTH regulatory session at ISTH 2026
-
Jul 14, 2026, 11:21Malwina Maliszewska: Advancing Coagulation Diagnostics at ISTH 2026