Saleh Shamse Basha/LinkedIn
Jun 26, 2026, 07:10
Saleh Shamse Basha: Why APTT Alone Can Be Misleading During UFH Monitoring
Saleh Shamse Basha, Senior Hematology Technologist (Reference Lab, HQ) at PureLab, shared a post on LinkedIn:
“A patient post surgical inflammation on unfractionated heparin (UFH).
APTT: 66 sec.
In thise case can you relay on APTT alone to monitor the UFH??
The answer is : No.
But, Why?
During the acute-phase response, Factor VIII is often elevated.
Increased FVIII shortens the APTT, meaning that an APTT of 66 seconds may underestimate the true anticoagulant effect of UFH.
That’s the trap.
That’s why we should use Anti-Xa assay while monitoring patient on UFH.”
Stay updated with Hemostasis Today.
-
Nov 8, 2026, 19:31Anna Kajaste-Rudnitski: Presenting AAV-Induced p53 Signalling in Human CNS Cells at ESGCT 26
-
Nov 8, 2026, 19:29David McIntosh: Cybersecurity Matters, but Blood Availability Remains the Bigger Challenge
-
Nov 8, 2026, 19:26Wenxue Ma: An Integrative Framework for Macrophage-Mediated Therapeutic Resistance in Cancer
-
Nov 8, 2026, 19:25Yildiz Yigit: Presenting a Polycythemia Vera Case at the MPN Subcommittee Session
-
Nov 8, 2026, 18:56Denis Oduor: Strengthening the Regulation and Delivery of Blood Transfusion and Transplantation Services
-
Nov 8, 2026, 18:28Raghavendra Rao: A Narrative Review on Chronic Venous Disease during Pregnancy
-
Nov 8, 2026, 17:57Dhiren Patel: PLD1-Derived Phospholipids Regulate NAD Kinase and ROS Production in Neutrophils
-
Nov 8, 2026, 17:48Andra T.: What Causes Antiphospholipid Syndrome? – Four Steps, not One Cause
-
Nov 8, 2026, 17:38Nasrin Samadi: Can a Normal Clotting Test Be Misleading?