Notice: Function WP_Scripts::add was called incorrectly. The script with the handle "jquery" was enqueued with dependencies that are not registered: jquery-migrate. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.9.1.) in /var/www/vhosts/hemostasistoday.com/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6131

Hemostasis Today

February, 2026
February 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
232425262728  
Kapka Miteva: Why Sex and Gender Matter in Ischemic Heart Disease
Feb 4, 2026, 16:14

Kapka Miteva: Why Sex and Gender Matter in Ischemic Heart Disease

Kapka Miteva, Associate Editor at the European Heart Journal, shared a post on LinkedIn:

”Why Sex and Gender Matter – ESC Scientific Statement revealing critical disparities in ischemic heart disease between men and women

Key Findings at a Glance

  • Women are underdiagnosed and undertreated due to male-centric diagnostic criteria and guideline biases.
  • Symptoms differ: Women more often present with atypical symptoms (fatigue, nausea, back pain) rather than classic chest pain.
  • Pathophysiology varies: Women have higher rates of microvascular dysfunction, coronary spasm, and non-obstructive CAD.
  • Risk profiles are sex-specific: Pregnancy complications, autoimmune diseases, and hormonal changes uniquely affect women’s cardiovascular risk.
  • Outcomes are worse for young women with STEMI, despite less obstructive disease.
  • Pharmacological responses differ: Women experience more side effects and different efficacy profiles for common CV drugs.
  • Transgender individuals on hormone therapy face distinct cardiovascular risks that are poorly understood.

Critical Data Points

Women with ACS are less likely to receive guideline-recommended therapies (aspirin, statins, beta-blockers).

  • Young women (<55) with STEMI have significantly higher mortality than men, even after adjusting for risk factors.
  • Microvascular angina and coronary spasm are 2–3 times more common in women.
  • 20–30% of participants in CV clinical trials are women, limiting evidence-based care for half the population.

Diagnostic bias: Using male-derived troponin cutoffs leads to underdiagnosis of MI in women.
Treatment gaps: Women are less often referred for invasive procedures (angiography, PCI, CABG)
Research inequity due to dangerous knowledge gap: Most pathophysiology and treatment studies are conducted in men.

Actionable Recommendations

  • Adopt sex-specific diagnostic thresholds (e.g., high-sensitivity troponin).
  • Increase awareness of non-traditional female-specific risk factors (e.g., preeclampsia, menopause, PCOS).
  • Promote inclusion of women in RCTs—aim for equal enrollment and sex-stratified analysis.
  • Develop female-focused guidelines for prevention, diagnosis, and management.
  • Use advanced imaging (CMR, CT perfusion) to detect microvascular dysfunction in women with angina and non-obstructive CAD.
  • Train healthcare providers to recognize sex- and gender-specific presentations and risks.

The Big Picture: Equity in Cardiovascular Care – need for horizontal equity (equal access to care) and vertical equity (tailored care for biological and social differences). Achieving this requires:

  • Sex-disaggregated data collection
  • Education campaigns
  • Policy changes

Collaboration across cardiology, primary care, endocrinology, and obstetrics

How sex and gender shape heart disease could not be ignored!

‘women’s heart health’— focus on precision medicine and equity!”

Stay updated with Hemostasis Today.