Francisco Chacón-Lozsán: Rethinking PE Risk in 2026
Francisco Chacón-Lozsán, Fellow at World Extreme Medicine, Member of European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) and American College of Cardiology, shared a post on X:
“Pulmonary embolism in 2026: are our traditional risk categories becoming too static?
A new 2026 consensus from the Interamerican Society of Cardiology is particularly interesting when read alongside the 2026 AHA/ACC guideline and the still-current 2019 ESC/ERS guideline.
Three frameworks, one important evolution.
The 2019 ESC/ERS model established the familiar low, intermediate-low, intermediate-high and high-risk categories.
In normotensive patients, the combination of clinical risk, RV dysfunction and troponin identifies intermediate-high risk patients who require close monitoring and rescue reperfusion if deterioration occurs.
The 2026 AHA/ACC guideline goes further, replacing the older massive/submassive terminology with categories A through E. Importantly, it explicitly recognizes incipient cardiopulmonary failure in Category D, including patients developing hypoperfusion before persistent hypotension, and incorporates a respiratory modifier.
New Sistema Integrado de Afectación Cardiorrespiratoria, SIAC, integrates hemodynamics, RV dysfunction, gas exchange, biomarkers and clinical evolution, with serial reassessment intended to detect progression before overt deterioration. The RV can progressively fail.
Oxygen requirements can increase. Lactate can rise. Perfusion can deteriorate while arterial pressure is still apparently preserved…Blood pressure is a late variable in obstructive shock.
This is where the 2026 American and Interamerican approaches appear conceptually closer than their terminology suggests.
Both move toward recognizing a dynamic transition from RV stress – impaired cardiopulmonary reserve – hypoperfusion – overt shock, rather than waiting for sustained hypotension to redefine severity.
The ESC framework already requires monitoring for deterioration, but its formal risk categories remain the 2019 structure.
The ESC currently lists a new PE guideline in development.
There is also substantial agreement elsewhere: pretest probability remains fundamental, Wells/Geneva, PERC and YEARS remain useful diagnostic tools, PESI/sPESI and Hestia remain important for disposition, DOACs dominate eligible oral anticoagulation, PERT models are increasingly emphasized, and reperfusion is clearly indicated for the unstable patient while selection of advanced therapy in patients at risk of deterioration remains more nuanced.”
Title: 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism developed in collaboration with the European Respiratory Society (ERS): The Task Force for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)
Authors: Stavros V Konstantinides, Guy Meyer, Cecilia Becattini, Héctor Bueno, Geert-Jan Geersing, Veli-Pekka Harjola, Menno V Huisman, Marc Humbert, Catriona Sian Jennings, David Jiménez, Nils Kucher, Irene Marthe Lang, Mareike Lankeit, Roberto Lorusso, Lucia Mazzolai, Nicolas Meneveau, Fionnuala Ní Áinle, Paolo Prandoni, Piotr Pruszczyk, Marc Righini, Adam Torbicki, Eric Van Belle, José Luis Zamorano
Title: Pulmonary embolism consensus
Authors: Miguel A. Quintana, Joaquín Perea, Arnaldo López-Ruiz, Mauricio Soto, Marildes Castro, Rafael Silva-Cortés, Alexandra Arias, Alex Rivera, Manuel Álvarez, Patricio Sanhueza, Yaqueline Quispe, Roger Tenezaca, Juan P. Costabel, Iván Saavedra, Roberto Colque, Ismenia Diez-Pérez, Gonzalo Pérez, Paola Morejón, Karina Gan-Fernández, Adriana Mogollón, Marcelo Cardona, Dahiana Ibarrola, Ricardo Villarreal
Title: 2026 AHA/ACC/ACCP/ACEP/CHEST/SCAI/SHM/SIR/SVM/SVN Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines
Authors: Mark A. Creager, Geoffrey D. Barnes, Jay Giri, Debabrata Mukherjee, William Schuyler Jones, Allison E. Burnett, Teresa Carman, Ana I. Casanegra, Lana A. Castellucci, Sherrell M. Clark, Mary Cushman, Kerstin de Wit, Jennifer M. Eaves, Margaret C. Fang, Joshua B. Goldberg, Stanislav Henkin, Hillary Johnston-Cox, Sabeeda Kadavath, Daniella Kadian-Dodov, William Brent Keeling, Andrew J.P. Klein, Jun Li, Michael C. McDaniel, Lisa K. Moores, Gregory Piazza, Karen S. Prenger, Steven C. Pugliese, Mona Ranade, Rachel P. Rosovsky, Farla Russo, Eric A. Secemsky, Akhilesh K. Sista, Leben Tefera, Ido Weinberg, Lauren M. Westafer, Michael N. Young
Find more posts featuring Francisco Chacón-Lozsán on Hemostasis Today.
-
Sep 23, 2026, 11:58Ifeanyichukwu Ifechidere: Factor V Leiden Requires Context Beyond the Genetic Result
-
Sep 23, 2026, 11:35Martina Wolff: How Platelet Membrane Protrusions Shape Hemostasis and Thrombosis
-
Sep 23, 2026, 11:28Alejandro González Veliz: Ultrashort DAPT After PCI May Reduce Bleeding Without Increasing Overall Ischemic Events
-
Sep 23, 2026, 11:17High DOAC Adherence After Stroke – International Journal of Stroke
-
Sep 23, 2026, 11:08John Cush: Do JAK Inhibitors Increase VTE Risk After Joint Replacement?
-
Sep 23, 2026, 11:05Fonkou Steve: Blood Choice Requires Access to Safe Transfusion Options
-
Sep 23, 2026, 11:00Linda Rockwood: Cultural and Ethical Change in Transfusion Medicine
-
Sep 23, 2026, 10:30Michael Angers: Advancing Transfusion Safety Through Smarter Laboratory Workflows
-
Sep 23, 2026, 07:28Isabelle Grenier-Pleau: Targeting Von Willebrand Disease to Transform Women’s Health