Martin Haluzík Analyzes the Overall Accuracy of Current Available Smartwatches in Identifying AF
Martin Haluzík, Professor of Medicine at Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, shared on LinkedIn about a recent article by Nelson Barrera et al, published in JACC:
”Accuracy of Smartwatches in the Detection of Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Diagnostic Meta-Analysis
Very interesting paper recently published in JACC: Advances by Nelson Barrera and colleagues.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most prevalent arrhythmia and a significant risk factor for stroke and heart disease, making early diagnosis crucial for prevention. Although several smartwatches can detect AF, their accuracy varies, and there is limited information regarding their effectiveness.
The purpose of this study was to analyze the overall accuracy of current available smartwatches in identifying AF.
A comprehensive systematic literature search was performed across major databases for articles published until January 2025.
The specificity, sensitivity, and area under the curve (AUC). Statistical analysis was conducted using R software.
Twenty-six studies were included in the study, including 17,349 patients. Overall sensitivity was 95% (95% CI: 92%-97%; I2 = 95%) and specificity 97% (95% CI: 94%-98%; I2 = 99%), with a pooled AUC of 0.97 (95% CI: 0.96%-0.99%).
Device performance varied, with the Apple Watch achieving 94% sensitivity (95% CI: 89%-96%; I2 = 71%) and 97% specificity (95% CI: 93%-99%; I2 = 87%), Samsung devices yielding 97% sensitivity (95% CI: 92%-99%; I2 = 92%) and 96% specificity (95% CI: 91%-98%; I2 = 92%), and the Withings Scan Watch showing 89% sensitivity (95% CI: 75%-96%; I2 = 94%) and 95% specificity (95% CI: 88%-99%; I2 = 93%).
Accuracy was comparable between photoplethysmography and electrocardiogram-based models.
Smartwatches possess excellent diagnostic accuracy for AF detection and may, therefore, represent a suitable and fitting option for patients.
- Very interesting data
- Overall, impressive specificity and sensitivity.
- Now, the question is, should all patients with high risk of AF wear these devices to detect and treat early?
- I would bet that not only money but also couple of lifes could be saved by this approach
Excellent paper! Congratulations to the authors!”
Title: Accuracy of Smartwatches in the Detection of Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Diagnostic Meta-Analysis
Authors: Nelson Barrera, Maria Solorzano, Yomary Jimenez, Yevhen Kushnir, Francisco Gallegos-Koyner, Guilherme Dagostin de Carvalho
Read the Full Article on JACC
Stay updated on all scientific advances with Hemostasis Today.
-
Aug 11, 2026, 06:48Rishdha Roshad: What Happens to the Brain During Cardiopulmonary Bypass?
-
Aug 11, 2026, 05:53Isaac Okello: Strengthening Sickle Cell Advocacy in Uganda
-
Aug 11, 2026, 05:38Rami Unterman: A Simple New Biomarker for Fibrotic ILDs
-
Aug 11, 2026, 04:10Haroun Gajraj: CLaCS vs Sclerotherapy – What Does the Evidence Show
-
Aug 11, 2026, 02:54Tareq Abadl: The Ultimate Guide to Clinically Significant Antibodies
-
Aug 10, 2026, 17:35Chokri Ben Lamine: Balancing Holistic Care and Precision in Hematology
-
Aug 10, 2026, 17:14Anna Stanizzi: Patient Blood Management as a New Model of Personalized Care
-
Aug 10, 2026, 17:12Odong Christopher: New Research on Ischemic Stroke Prediction in Uganda
-
Aug 10, 2026, 16:58Jeff Szer AM: Advancing the Management of Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria