Filippo Cademartiri: What Happened When Guidelines Shifted Against Aspirin for Primary Cardiovascular Prevention
Filippo Cademartiri, Consultant Advanced Cardiovascular Imaging at UPMC Salvator Mundi International Hospital, posted on LinkedIn about a recent article by Stephanea Roeser et al, published in American Journal of Preventive Cardiology:
”Aspirin use is declining – but not always for the right reasons
This 2025 population-based study examines what happened when guidelines shifted against aspirin for primary cardiovascular prevention – and how people actually responded in real life.
What the study did
Researchers conducted three large telephone surveys (2015, 2017, 2019–2020) across five U.S. states, including 8,197 adults without prior cardiovascular disease. The goal: track aspirin use, cessation, and reasons for stoppingduring a period of changing evidence and guidelines.
Key trends
Aspirin use for primary prevention was:
39% in 2015
41% in 2017
decreased 34% in 2019–20
The proportion of people stopping aspirin rose from 14–15% to 22%
So yes – use declined, but slowly and incompletely.
Why did people stop?
Among those who quit:
- Doctor’s advice was the leading reason (38% by 2019–20)
- Negative media coverage surged dramatically (from 4% to 29%)
- Bleeding, side effects, or ‘doesn’t work’ were less common drivers
Notably, guidelines alone had little immediate impact. The biggest behavioral shift followed high-profile media coverage of aspirin trials – not the 2016 USPSTF recommendations.
The hidden problem
Despite updated evidence:
- One-third of older adults still use aspirin for primary prevention
- Many self-prescribe, enabled by low cost and easy access
- Fewer than half ever discussed aspirin with a clinician
Meanwhile, abrupt aspirin discontinuation may increase short-term CV risk, a nuance often lost in public messaging.
Bottom line
Guidelines don’t change practice on their own.
Clinician conversations matter more than headlines.
The aspirin story isn’t just about evidence – it’s about how evidence is communicated, interpreted, and acted upon.”
Title: Population cessation of aspirin use for the prevention of cardiovascular disease
Authors: Stephanea Roeser, Sue Duval, Russell V. Luepker, Milton Eder, John R. Finnegan, Jeremy R. Van’t Hof
Read the Full Article on American Journal of Preventive Cardiology

Stay updated with Hemostasis Today.
-
Nov 13, 2026, 03:21Abdul Muqtadir Abbasi: Iron Deficiency Beyond Anemia and the Importance of Finding the Cause
-
Nov 13, 2026, 03:05Marc Carrier: Aspirin vs Anticoagulants for VTE Prevention After Joint Replacement
-
Nov 13, 2026, 02:28Julia Sjöberg: ROCK1 Inhibition and Red Blood Cell Recovery After Chemotherapy
-
Nov 13, 2026, 02:07Tonie Reincke: Understanding Deep Vein Thrombosis and Vascular Health
-
Nov 13, 2026, 01:52Akshita Singh: The Remarkable Process of Blood Clotting
-
Nov 12, 2026, 22:52Milka Koupenova: The Role of Platelet RIG-I in Regulating Thrombotic Responses
-
Nov 12, 2026, 22:50Arun V J: Why Has India Still Not Achieved 100% Voluntary Blood Donation?
-
Nov 12, 2026, 22:49Sickle Cell Disease Deserves to Be Prioritised in Ghana – ISCC
-
Nov 12, 2026, 22:47Samir Kumar Beura: Delighted to Serve as a Topic Editor for a Research Topic in Frontiers in Neuroscience