Filippo Cademartiri: What Happened When Guidelines Shifted Against Aspirin for Primary Cardiovascular Prevention
Filippo Cademartiri, Consultant Advanced Cardiovascular Imaging at UPMC Salvator Mundi International Hospital, posted on LinkedIn about a recent article by Stephanea Roeser et al, published in American Journal of Preventive Cardiology:
”Aspirin use is declining – but not always for the right reasons
This 2025 population-based study examines what happened when guidelines shifted against aspirin for primary cardiovascular prevention – and how people actually responded in real life.
What the study did
Researchers conducted three large telephone surveys (2015, 2017, 2019–2020) across five U.S. states, including 8,197 adults without prior cardiovascular disease. The goal: track aspirin use, cessation, and reasons for stoppingduring a period of changing evidence and guidelines.
Key trends
Aspirin use for primary prevention was:
39% in 2015
41% in 2017
decreased 34% in 2019–20
The proportion of people stopping aspirin rose from 14–15% to 22%
So yes – use declined, but slowly and incompletely.
Why did people stop?
Among those who quit:
- Doctor’s advice was the leading reason (38% by 2019–20)
- Negative media coverage surged dramatically (from 4% to 29%)
- Bleeding, side effects, or ‘doesn’t work’ were less common drivers
Notably, guidelines alone had little immediate impact. The biggest behavioral shift followed high-profile media coverage of aspirin trials – not the 2016 USPSTF recommendations.
The hidden problem
Despite updated evidence:
- One-third of older adults still use aspirin for primary prevention
- Many self-prescribe, enabled by low cost and easy access
- Fewer than half ever discussed aspirin with a clinician
Meanwhile, abrupt aspirin discontinuation may increase short-term CV risk, a nuance often lost in public messaging.
Bottom line
Guidelines don’t change practice on their own.
Clinician conversations matter more than headlines.
The aspirin story isn’t just about evidence – it’s about how evidence is communicated, interpreted, and acted upon.”
Title: Population cessation of aspirin use for the prevention of cardiovascular disease
Authors: Stephanea Roeser, Sue Duval, Russell V. Luepker, Milton Eder, John R. Finnegan, Jeremy R. Van’t Hof
Read the Full Article on American Journal of Preventive Cardiology

Stay updated with Hemostasis Today.
-
Jun 29, 2026, 06:48Christina Pohlman: Anticoagulants and Bone Health – APS Awareness Month Day 23
-
Jun 29, 2026, 06:33Andreas Calatzis: Can Fibrinolysis Sensitivity Be Claimed Without a Reference Standard
-
Jun 29, 2026, 06:25Aliaa Albadri: When a Hair Wash Leads to a Stroke Workup
-
Jun 29, 2026, 06:22Tehreen Parveen: Historical Milestone in Drug Discovery – The Discovery of Aspirin
-
Jun 29, 2026, 06:16Muhammad Sufyan: Deep Vein Thrombosis – Recognizing the Warning Signs
-
Jun 29, 2026, 05:33Janak Sadhu: Uniting for The Stroke-Free Mehsana Initiative
-
Jun 29, 2026, 05:20Deepti Sachan: A Global Exchange Shaping the Future of Transfusion Medicine at ISBT 2026
-
Jun 29, 2026, 04:50Scott Cameron: ACC/AHA Guidance on Acute Pulmonary Embolism Management
-
Jun 29, 2026, 03:10Aryabhatta Sadhu: ABO and Rh Incompatibility In Stem Cell Transplantation