Umberto Pensato on Reperfusion Outcomes in Stroke
Umberto Pensato, Assistant Professor of Neurology at the Humanitas University, Research Collaborator at the University of Calgary, shared on LinkedIn:
”In this opinion paper published in Stroke, we argue against reperfusion in every ischemic stroke patient.
Reperfusion can be beneficial, futile, or harmful depending on the extension and (most importantly) severity of the ischemic core.
Moreover, both relative and absolute treatment effects should be considered for treatment decision-making.
Notably, this opinion paper was born from a vivid discussion about a single patient with my Canadian mentors: Michael Hill, Bijoy Menon, Johanna Ospel, Andrew Demchuk; Humanitas University; University of Calgary; American Heart Association”
Read the full article in Stroke.
Article: Futile and Harmful Reperfusion and the Balance Between Treatment Effect and Overall Outcomes in Stroke
Authors: Umberto Pensato, Michael D. Hill, Bijoy K. Menon, Andrew M. Demchuk, Johanna M. Ospel
Stay updated on all scientific advances in the field of thrombosis with Hemostasis Today.
-
Aug 11, 2026, 08:07Nicola Pozzi: Advancing Hemostasis Through Scientific Collaboration at Hemostasis GRC
-
Aug 11, 2026, 07:50When Access to Care Changes Everything – WFH
-
Aug 11, 2026, 07:41Kevin Land: How Cellular Therapy Is Changing Transfusion Medicine
-
Aug 11, 2026, 07:35Kuldeep Singh Bhadauria: Building the Future of Hemophilia Care in India
-
Aug 11, 2026, 07:28Archil Jaliashvili: When Every Minute Matters Time Becomes a Therapy
-
Aug 11, 2026, 07:05Mavis Agnes Kisakye: Building Sustainable Transition Pathways in Hemophilia Care
-
Aug 11, 2026, 06:48Rishdha Roshad: What Happens to the Brain During Cardiopulmonary Bypass?
-
Aug 11, 2026, 05:53Isaac Okello: Strengthening Sickle Cell Advocacy in Uganda
-
Aug 11, 2026, 05:38Rami Unterman: A Simple New Biomarker for Fibrotic ILDs