Filippo Cademartiri: What Happened When Guidelines Shifted Against Aspirin for Primary Cardiovascular Prevention
Filippo Cademartiri, Consultant Advanced Cardiovascular Imaging at UPMC Salvator Mundi International Hospital, posted on LinkedIn about a recent article by Stephanea Roeser et al, published in American Journal of Preventive Cardiology:
”Aspirin use is declining – but not always for the right reasons
This 2025 population-based study examines what happened when guidelines shifted against aspirin for primary cardiovascular prevention – and how people actually responded in real life.
What the study did
Researchers conducted three large telephone surveys (2015, 2017, 2019–2020) across five U.S. states, including 8,197 adults without prior cardiovascular disease. The goal: track aspirin use, cessation, and reasons for stoppingduring a period of changing evidence and guidelines.
Key trends
Aspirin use for primary prevention was:
39% in 2015
41% in 2017
decreased 34% in 2019–20
The proportion of people stopping aspirin rose from 14–15% to 22%
So yes – use declined, but slowly and incompletely.
Why did people stop?
Among those who quit:
- Doctor’s advice was the leading reason (38% by 2019–20)
- Negative media coverage surged dramatically (from 4% to 29%)
- Bleeding, side effects, or ‘doesn’t work’ were less common drivers
Notably, guidelines alone had little immediate impact. The biggest behavioral shift followed high-profile media coverage of aspirin trials – not the 2016 USPSTF recommendations.
The hidden problem
Despite updated evidence:
- One-third of older adults still use aspirin for primary prevention
- Many self-prescribe, enabled by low cost and easy access
- Fewer than half ever discussed aspirin with a clinician
Meanwhile, abrupt aspirin discontinuation may increase short-term CV risk, a nuance often lost in public messaging.
Bottom line
Guidelines don’t change practice on their own.
Clinician conversations matter more than headlines.
The aspirin story isn’t just about evidence – it’s about how evidence is communicated, interpreted, and acted upon.”
Title: Population cessation of aspirin use for the prevention of cardiovascular disease
Authors: Stephanea Roeser, Sue Duval, Russell V. Luepker, Milton Eder, John R. Finnegan, Jeremy R. Van’t Hof
Read the Full Article on American Journal of Preventive Cardiology

Stay updated with Hemostasis Today.
-
Jun 29, 2026, 15:50Sweta Agrawal: Expanding Care for PNH Patients in Nepal
-
Jun 29, 2026, 15:17Heghine Khachatryan: Hemostasis at the Crossroads of Thrombosis and Bleeding
-
Jun 29, 2026, 15:07Tomaz Crochemore: From Bleeding to Thrombosis – The Era of Precision Hemostatic Medicine Has Arrived
-
Jun 29, 2026, 14:51Pete Stibbs: Building a Successful Venous Thrombectomy Practice
-
Jun 29, 2026, 14:30Bruno Pougault: Pregnancy and Thrombosis – Balancing Evolutionary Protection Against Clinical Risk
-
Jun 29, 2026, 13:32Omid Seidizadeh: The Full VWD Session from EHA 2026 Is Now Available to Watch
-
Jun 29, 2026, 13:22Cheryl Carcel: Make The Stroke Research More Inclusive for Women, Take The Survey
-
Jun 29, 2026, 13:18Bianca Rocca: New Expert Opinion On the Evolving Debate on Factor XI as a Therapeutic Target
-
Jun 29, 2026, 13:06Francisco Chacón-Lozsán: Intermittent Hemodialysis in the ICU Should not be Monitored Only by ‘Session Completed’