Filippo Cademartiri: What Happened When Guidelines Shifted Against Aspirin for Primary Cardiovascular Prevention
Filippo Cademartiri, Consultant Advanced Cardiovascular Imaging at UPMC Salvator Mundi International Hospital, posted on LinkedIn about a recent article by Stephanea Roeser et al, published in American Journal of Preventive Cardiology:
”Aspirin use is declining – but not always for the right reasons
This 2025 population-based study examines what happened when guidelines shifted against aspirin for primary cardiovascular prevention – and how people actually responded in real life.
What the study did
Researchers conducted three large telephone surveys (2015, 2017, 2019–2020) across five U.S. states, including 8,197 adults without prior cardiovascular disease. The goal: track aspirin use, cessation, and reasons for stoppingduring a period of changing evidence and guidelines.
Key trends
Aspirin use for primary prevention was:
39% in 2015
41% in 2017
decreased 34% in 2019–20
The proportion of people stopping aspirin rose from 14–15% to 22%
So yes – use declined, but slowly and incompletely.
Why did people stop?
Among those who quit:
- Doctor’s advice was the leading reason (38% by 2019–20)
- Negative media coverage surged dramatically (from 4% to 29%)
- Bleeding, side effects, or ‘doesn’t work’ were less common drivers
Notably, guidelines alone had little immediate impact. The biggest behavioral shift followed high-profile media coverage of aspirin trials – not the 2016 USPSTF recommendations.
The hidden problem
Despite updated evidence:
- One-third of older adults still use aspirin for primary prevention
- Many self-prescribe, enabled by low cost and easy access
- Fewer than half ever discussed aspirin with a clinician
Meanwhile, abrupt aspirin discontinuation may increase short-term CV risk, a nuance often lost in public messaging.
Bottom line
Guidelines don’t change practice on their own.
Clinician conversations matter more than headlines.
The aspirin story isn’t just about evidence – it’s about how evidence is communicated, interpreted, and acted upon.”
Title: Population cessation of aspirin use for the prevention of cardiovascular disease
Authors: Stephanea Roeser, Sue Duval, Russell V. Luepker, Milton Eder, John R. Finnegan, Jeremy R. Van’t Hof
Read the Full Article on American Journal of Preventive Cardiology

Stay updated with Hemostasis Today.
-
Mar 22, 2026, 17:21Arrigo Francesco Giuseppe Cicero: Diagnostic and Prognostic Perspectives of Glycocalyx Disruption in Pregnancy
-
Mar 22, 2026, 17:19Veronica Sanchez: Stress from Pregnancy Complications Impacts The Long-Term Cardiovascular Health
-
Mar 22, 2026, 16:21Ala Eddin Sagar: Apixaban vs Rivaroxaban on This Week in Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine
-
Mar 22, 2026, 16:14Andre W. Bourgoyne: Anemia Management as a Comprehensive Hospital Performance Strategy
-
Mar 22, 2026, 16:03Fibrinogen-Guided Management of Postpartum Hemorrhage – Transfusion Medicine KMC Manipal
-
Mar 22, 2026, 15:48Simon Senanu: Diagnostic Significance of Target Cells in Peripheral Blood Smear
-
Mar 22, 2026, 15:43Hayley Evans: What If The Decision Support System Is Part of The Problem?
-
Mar 22, 2026, 15:29Archit Pandharipande: The Burden and Impact of Heavy Menstrual Bleeding in Adolescents with Bleeding Disorders
-
Mar 22, 2026, 15:17Mamtha Balla: Mastering the Lab and Clinical Connection in Hemostasis and Thrombosis