William Aird: Why Did Mammalian Red Blood Cells Give Up Their Nucleus?
William Aird, Professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School, shared a post on LinkedIn:
“Why did mammalian red cells give up their nucleus?
Most cells protect their nucleus.
Mammalian red cells do the opposite.
They eject it.
At first glance, this looks like a loss.
No DNA, no repair, no division. A finite lifespan.
But it is better understood as a trade-off.
Removing the nucleus allows the cell to remove something else too:
its mitochondria.
And with that, a potential conflict of interest.
A red cell that carries oxygen but also consumes it would compete with the tissues it serves.
By giving up mitochondria, the red cell commits fully to delivery.
It does not use the oxygen it transports.
It gives it away.
That same simplification has other consequences:
- more space for hemoglobin
- greater deformability in narrow capillaries
- fewer intracellular obstacles to diffusion
- educed capacity to support viral replication
But the central idea is this:
the red cell becomes a specialist by subtraction.
It gives up autonomy to eliminate internal competition and to optimize a single function.
Not every organism makes this choice.
Other vertebrates retain nucleated red cells.
Their constraints are different.
Mammals chose another path.
One that favors efficiency of delivery over cellular independence.
What looks like loss is the elimination of internal conflict.”
Read more on The Blood Project.
Find more posts featuring William Aird on Hemostasis Today.
-
Sep 5, 2026, 16:28Jon Douglas: Imperial College London Review Maps Key Pathways in Autoimmune Thrombosis
-
Sep 5, 2026, 16:21Kelly Anderson: Bilateral Foot Pain and Purple Toes – Spotting Vascular Complications in Polycythemia Vera
-
Sep 5, 2026, 16:16Hazem Abosheaishaa: Beta-Blocker Selection Matters – Multi-Institutional Cohort Insights on PVT and Survival in Cirrhosis
-
Sep 5, 2026, 16:08Indre Ceponiene: Major Gaps in Secondary Cardiovascular Prevention Across Europe
-
Sep 5, 2026, 16:03W. Alberto Sifuentes Giraldo: Why Obstetric Cases Are Missed Under 2023 ACR/EULAR APS Criteria
-
Sep 5, 2026, 15:58Srikanth Nalla: A Case of Saddle Pulmonary Embolism
-
Sep 5, 2026, 15:55COPD-specific Pulmonary Embolism Diagnostic Strategy – Thrombosis and Haemostasis
-
Sep 5, 2026, 15:41Sam Tsimikas on Lp(a) HORIZON Topline Results – What Missed Endpoints Mean for Cardiovascular Risk
-
Sep 5, 2026, 15:32Stefano Garzon: SELUTION DeNovo HBR – Weren’t HBR Patients Supposed to Bleed More with DES?