Heghine Khachatryan: Less Frequent INR Monitoring – Does It Necessarily Mean Poorer Anticoagulation Control?
Heghine Khachatryan, Editor-in-Chief of Hemostasis Today, Head of Hemophilia and Thrombosis Center at Yeolyan Hematology and Oncology Center, shared Thrombosis Update’s post on LinkedIn:
“Less frequent INR monitoring — does it necessarily mean poorer anticoagulation control?
An important real-world observation from a Dutch dynamic cohort study published in Thrombosis Update challenges an assumption deeply embedded in VKA management: that reducing INR testing frequency will inevitably compromise anticoagulation stability.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, INR monitoring became less frequent compared with the pre-pandemic period. Yet, importantly, this temporary reduction did not appear to impair VKA stability.
The message is nuanced.
Regular INR monitoring remains a cornerstone of safe and effective vitamin K antagonist therapy. However, in appropriately selected, clinically stable patients, the optimal monitoring strategy may be more individualized than a rigid testing schedule suggests.
For me, the broader lesson extends beyond the pandemic:
Good anticoagulation management is not simply about how often we measure INR—it is about identifying when monitoring adds meaningful clinical value and adapting follow-up to the stability and risk profile of the individual patient.
This raises an interesting question for contemporary anticoagulation practice:
Can we move from fixed INR-monitoring intervals toward more personalized, risk-adapted monitoring strategies in stable VKA-treated patients?”
Thrombosis Update shared a post on LinkedIn about a recent article by Tessa Elling et al., adding:
“This dutch dynamic cohort study in Thrombosis Update reported decreased INR testing frequency during the COVID19 compared with the pre-pandemic period.
Here is the link of the the associated editorial commentary.”
Title: Impact of reduced INR monitoring frequency on anticoagulation control during the COVID-19 pandemic: A dutch dynamic cohort study
Authors: Tessa Elling, Nic J.G.M. Veeger, Derk Hardeman, Adrian Kruit, Jos G.J. Pouwels, Jenneke Stegeman, Vladimir Tichelaar, Karina Meijer

Stay updated on all scientific advances with Hemostasis Today.
-
Nov 8, 2026, 19:31Anna Kajaste-Rudnitski: Presenting AAV-Induced p53 Signalling in Human CNS Cells at ESGCT 26
-
Nov 8, 2026, 19:29David McIntosh: Cybersecurity Matters, but Blood Availability Remains the Bigger Challenge
-
Nov 8, 2026, 19:26Wenxue Ma: An Integrative Framework for Macrophage-Mediated Therapeutic Resistance in Cancer
-
Nov 8, 2026, 19:25Yildiz Yigit: Presenting a Polycythemia Vera Case at the MPN Subcommittee Session
-
Nov 8, 2026, 18:56Denis Oduor: Strengthening the Regulation and Delivery of Blood Transfusion and Transplantation Services
-
Nov 8, 2026, 18:28Raghavendra Rao: A Narrative Review on Chronic Venous Disease during Pregnancy
-
Nov 8, 2026, 17:57Dhiren Patel: PLD1-Derived Phospholipids Regulate NAD Kinase and ROS Production in Neutrophils
-
Nov 8, 2026, 17:48Andra T.: What Causes Antiphospholipid Syndrome? – Four Steps, not One Cause
-
Nov 8, 2026, 17:38Nasrin Samadi: Can a Normal Clotting Test Be Misleading?