Abdul Mannan: When Gender Bias Becomes a Diagnostic Error – Inherited Bleeding Disorders are Still Being Missed
Dr Abdul Mannan, Consultant Haematologist at Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, shared a post on LinkedIn:
“When Gender Bias Becomes a Diagnostic Error
Inherited Bleeding Disorders are still being missed. Not because tests don’t exist. But because thinking stops too early.
In bleeding disorders, biology is not the only barrier.
Cognitive bias is.
Same system. Same disease risk. Very different responses.
When a man presents with joint bleeding, alarms go off.
Full coagulation work-up. Factor levels. Genetics. Diagnosis.
When a woman or girl presents with heavy menstrual bleeding, the response is often very different:
“It’s normal.”
“It runs in the family.”
“It’s gynaecological.”
“Try iron. Try hormones.”
And the hood never gets opened.
These are not knowledge gaps. They are cognitive roadblocks:
- Normalization of symptoms
Generational bleeding is mistaken for “family traits” rather than inherited disease. - The ‘only a carrier’ myth
Women with hemophilia genes are still assumed to be asymptomatic, despite clear evidence to the contrary. - Satisfied search error
Find mild vWD → stop investigating
Miss the second defect → label as “treatment-resistant”
- Physiological masking
Pregnancy normalizes factor levels → false reassurance → delayed postpartum hemorrhage. - Menstrual stigma
If bleeding isn’t quantified, it isn’t taken seriously.
A pad every 30 minutes becomes “just a heavy period”.
Think of it like this:
A man with hemarthrosis gets a flashing check engine light.
A woman with HMB gets a low tyre pressure warning.
One triggers diagnostics.
The other gets a quick fix.
Until the breakdown happens — surgery, childbirth, hemorrhage.
Key message:
Treatment failure in women is not “difficult anatomy”.
It is a red flag.
What changes outcomes?
- Structured bleeding assessment tools
- Factor levels in symptomatic “carriers”
- Looking for combined defects
- Testing outside pregnancy
- Taking menstrual bleeding seriously — clinically, not culturally
This infographic isn’t about blame.
It’s about where our thinking stops too soon.
If we don’t challenge these cognitive shortcuts, women with inherited bleeding disorders will continue to be diagnosed late, during crises, or not at all.
Blood Doctor
Because bleeding disorders don’t respect gender — but bias still does.”
Get more insights from Abdul Mannan with Hemostasis Today.
-
May 23, 2026, 03:02Maitri Vaishnav: Anatomical Variability and Surgical Relevance of Corona Mortis
-
May 23, 2026, 02:26Muhammad Hashim: When the Blood Smear Told a Different Story Behind a ‘Critical’ Platelet Count
-
May 23, 2026, 02:20Augustina Isioma Ikusemoro: Understanding One of the Most Common and Preventable Transfusion Reactions
-
May 23, 2026, 02:15What’s Your Advice for the Newly Diagnosed? – ITP Support Association
-
May 23, 2026, 02:08Rob Maloney: When You Stop Building Only a Career and Start Building a Life of Significance
-
May 23, 2026, 02:04Rahmathullah S.N.: Key Takeaways on Successful Surgical Outcomes in Patients with Congenital Bleeding Disorders
-
May 23, 2026, 01:51Paula Greter: Access and Innovation in Hemophilia through ERAH2026
-
May 22, 2026, 17:30Veronica Sanchez: Do You Live with Pain after a Stroke?
-
May 22, 2026, 17:25Maxime Dely: A Simple but Powerful Indicator of Platelet Quality