Ifeanyichukwu Ifechidere: DOAC Interference in Coagulation Tests – Are You Spotting It?
Ifeanyichukwu Ifechidere, Specialist Biomedical Scientist at Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, shared a post on LinkedIn:
“That ‘positive’ lupus anticoagulant result… might not be real.
And if you don’t catch it, you could be part of a misdiagnosis.
Let me talk to you — the biomedical scientist reviewing that coag screen. You run a lupus anticoagulant panel.
dRVVT ratio? – Prolonged.
APTT-based test? – Also prolonged.
‘Positive for LA,’ right?
Not so fast.
Is the patient on a DOAC?
Because here’s what many don’t realise:
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) — especially factor Xa inhibitors and direct thrombin inhibitors — can significantly interfere with phospholipid-dependent assays.
And the result? – False positives in lupus anticoagulant testing
I’ve seen it happen:
- Patients labelled as having antiphospholipid syndrome
- Unnecessary long-term anticoagulation decisions
- Clinical confusion…
All based on a misleading lab result
Here’s what should trigger your suspicion:
- Unexpected LA positivity with no clinical history
- Prolonged dRVVT and APTT in a patient on apixaban, rivaroxaban, or dabigatran
- Inconsistent confirmatory testing patterns
Because DOACs can:
- Prolong screening assays
- Affect confirmatory steps
- Mimic inhibitor patterns
And suddenly, your ‘LA positive’ isn’t a lupus anticoagulant at all…
It’s drug interference.
So before you validate that result, ask:
- ‘Do I know the anticoagulation status of this patient?’
- ‘Should this test have been performed while on a DOAC?’
- – ‘Do we need DOAC-neutralisation or alternative strategies?’
Because in coagulation…
Context isn’t optional — it’s everything.
This is the level of thinking that separates running tests from truly understanding them.
If you want to get better at spotting interferences, interpreting complex results, and protecting patients from misleading data…
I break it down with real case studies Simple, practical interpretation frameworks. No jargon. Just clarity. Because not every abnormal result is pathology. Sometimes… it’s the test being fooled.”

Other posts featuring Ifeanyichukwu Ifechidere on Hemostasis Today.
-
Jun 26, 2026, 18:28Daniel Pereira Monteiro: Why Is Beta Thalassaemia Major so Severe?
-
Jun 26, 2026, 18:27Pradip Pawar: Cell and Gene Therapy – Transforming Medicine in the 21st Century
-
Jun 26, 2026, 18:26Aviva Schwartz: How Can We Better Protect Patients After an Ischemic Stroke?
-
Jun 26, 2026, 18:25Does Reversing Factor Xa Inhibitors Really Carry as Much Thrombotic Risk as We Think? – RPTH Journal
-
Jun 26, 2026, 18:25Akshat Jain: Novel Therapies in Childhood Blood and Cancer Disorders
-
Jun 26, 2026, 16:57Abdul Muqtadir Abbasi: Anticoagulation in DVT Patients With Hidden Varices Requires Extreme Caution
-
Jun 26, 2026, 16:42Anesa Mulabecirovic: Why Von Willebrand Disease Takes Years to Diagnose in Women
-
Jun 26, 2026, 16:32Kaitlin Lichty: A New Identity Reflecting a Shared Legacy of Bleeding Disorders
-
Jun 26, 2026, 16:07Toong Youttananukorn: The WFH Registry Driving Better Care and Advocacy