Hemostasis Today
NewsFeed
Headlines Hematology Health Medicine VTE ASH Plasma Donation
Ifeanyichukwu Ifechidere: The Biggest DOAC Myth in Coagulation – ‘No Monitoring Required’
Ifeanyichukwu Ifechidere/LinkedIn
May 29, 2026, 02:41

Ifeanyichukwu Ifechidere: The Biggest DOAC Myth in Coagulation – ‘No Monitoring Required’

Ifeanyichukwu Ifechidere, Specialist Biomedical Scientist at Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, shared a post on LinkedIn:

“The biggest selling point of DOACs was also their biggest lie — ‘fixed dose, no monitoring required.’ Here’s what the fine print never told your patients.

That’s one of the most repeated statements in coagulation.

It’s also one of the most misunderstood.

Because while Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) were designed for predictable anticoagulation…

predictable does Not mean problem-free.

And this is where many laboratory professionals — and even clinicians — get caught off guard.

Let’s be clear:

DOACs usually do not require routine therapeutic monitoring like warfarin.

But ‘no routine monitoring’ is very different from: ‘Never monitor them’

‘Ignore the laboratory impact’

‘Assume every patient responds predictably’

Because real-life patients are not textbook patients.

I’ve seen situations where DOAC measurement became critical:

  • Major bleeding
  • Emergency surgery
  • Suspected overdose
  • Renal impairment
  • Extreme body weight
  • Recurrent thrombosis despite therapy
  • Unexplained abnormal coagulation results

And here’s the dangerous part

Many people still rely on PT/APTT to estimate DOAC effect.

But depending on:

  • the drug
  • the reagent
  • the analyser

…the result may be:

  • highly sensitive
  • minimally sensitive
  • completely misleading.

A ‘normal’ PT/APTT does Not reliably exclude clinically significant DOAC levels.

Read that again.

This is why understanding assay limitations matters.

Because DOACs can:

  • Falsely prolong lupus anticoagulant testing
  • Distort clot-based factor assays
  • Interfere with thrombophilia investigations and
  • Create confusing coagulation profiles

And unless you actively think about DOAC interference…you may end up interpreting the wrong disease instead of the drug effect.

That’s why specialised assays matter:

  • Use of Anti-Xa assays for rivaroxaban/apixaban/edoxaban
  • Dilute thrombin time or ecarin-based assays for dabigatran

Not because we monitor every patient routinely —but because certain clinical situations demand accurate assessment.

As biomedical scientists, our role is evolving.

We are no longer just producing coagulation numbers.

We are identifying interferences, Understanding assay behaviour, and helping clinicians interpret anticoagulation safely

Because sometimes the most dangerous coagulation result…is the one everyone assumes they already understand.”

Ifeanyichukwu Ifechidere: The Biggest DOAC Myth in Coagulation - 'No Monitoring Required'

Find more posts featuring Ifeanyichukwu Ifechidere on Hemostasis Today.

Anticoagulation Apixaban APPT DOACs edoxaban Health Hematology Hemophilia Hemostasis Hemostasis News Hemostasis Today Ifeanyichukwu Ifechidere Medicine PT Rivaroxaban
NewsFeed