Ayuka King-Percival: How Lupus Anticoagulant Testing Works
Ayuka King-Percival, Senior Medical Technologist, Head of Hematology at LABORATORY, Adjunct Lecturer at College of Science, Technology and Applied Arts of Trinidad and Tobago-COSTAATT, shared a post on LinkedIn:
“Lupus Anticoagulant Testing: More Than Just a Name.
Despite its name, a lupus anticoagulant (LA) is not associated with bleeding.
It is an antiphospholipid antibody detected by its effect on phospholipid dependent coagulation assays and is associated with conditions such as thrombosis, pregnancy complications, and Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS).
Laboratory investigation involves three key stages:
1. Screening
Tests such as dilute Russell Viper Venom Time (dRVVT) and lupus sensitive activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) identify prolonged clotting times.
2. Mixing Study
Patient plasma is mixed with normal pooled plasma. Failure to correct suggests the presence of an inhibitor rather than a clotting factor deficiency.
3. Confirmation
Excess phospholipid is added. Shortening of the clotting time demonstrates phospholipid dependence, supporting the presence of a lupus anticoagulant.
A laboratory teaching analogy: Understanding the confirmation step
Imagine a car park with 20 available spaces.
The lupus anticoagulant is like 15 cars occupying those spaces, leaving limited room for phospholipid dependent coagulation reactions.
With reduced available phospholipid in the assay, the lupus anticoagulant can exert its inhibitory effect, resulting in a prolonged clotting time during screening.
Now imagine expanding the car park to 200 spaces.
The same 15 cars remain, but there are now 185 spaces available.
The additional phospholipid helps reduce the inhibitory effect of the lupus anticoagulant, allowing the coagulation reaction to proceed more normally and shortening the clotting time.
This is a simplified analogy.
Lupus anticoagulants do not literally occupy phospholipid molecules.
Instead, they interfere with phospholipid dependent coagulation reactions, which is why excess phospholipid can reduce their effect within the assay.
A lupus anticoagulant result should always be interpreted alongside the patient’s clinical history, anticoagulant therapy, potential assay interference, and other antiphospholipid antibody results.
The laboratory plays a vital role in translating complex coagulation findings into meaningful clinical information.
Every coagulation result tells a story.
Understanding the science behind it helps us tell that story correctly.”

Stay updated with Hemostasis Today.
-
Nov 8, 2026, 19:31Anna Kajaste-Rudnitski: Presenting AAV-Induced p53 Signalling in Human CNS Cells at ESGCT 26
-
Nov 8, 2026, 19:29David McIntosh: Cybersecurity Matters, but Blood Availability Remains the Bigger Challenge
-
Nov 8, 2026, 19:26Wenxue Ma: An Integrative Framework for Macrophage-Mediated Therapeutic Resistance in Cancer
-
Nov 8, 2026, 19:25Yildiz Yigit: Presenting a Polycythemia Vera Case at the MPN Subcommittee Session
-
Nov 8, 2026, 18:56Denis Oduor: Strengthening the Regulation and Delivery of Blood Transfusion and Transplantation Services
-
Nov 8, 2026, 18:28Raghavendra Rao: A Narrative Review on Chronic Venous Disease during Pregnancy
-
Nov 8, 2026, 17:57Dhiren Patel: PLD1-Derived Phospholipids Regulate NAD Kinase and ROS Production in Neutrophils
-
Nov 8, 2026, 17:48Andra T.: What Causes Antiphospholipid Syndrome? – Four Steps, not One Cause
-
Nov 8, 2026, 17:38Nasrin Samadi: Can a Normal Clotting Test Be Misleading?