Heghine Khachatryan: When Cancer Is Not Enough to Predict VTE Risk
Heghine Khachatryan, Editor-in-Chief of Hemostasis Today, Head of Hemophilia and Thrombosis Center at Yeolyan Hematology and Oncology Center, shared Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis’ post on LinkedIn, adding:
“When ‘Cancer’ Is Not Enough: Rethinking VTE Risk in Hospitalized Patients
Cancer-associated thrombosis remains one of the most challenging intersections of oncology and hemostasis.
Yet an important clinical question persists:
Can we identify which hospitalized patients with cancer are truly at greatest risk of venous thromboembolism—and target prevention more precisely?
A compelling new study by Karlyn A. Martin and colleagues, published in the Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis (JTH), takes an important step toward answering this question.
The investigators developed and externally validated a risk assessment model specifically for hospital-acquired VTE in medical inpatients with active cancer, using data from six academic health systems.
The model achieved an AUC of 0.68 in the development cohort and 0.64 in external validation and performed better than a non–cancer-specific model. JTH article
Why does this matter?
Because ‘cancer’ should not be treated as a single, uniform thrombotic risk category.
The hospitalized patient with cancer represents a particularly complex hemostatic environment: malignancy-related hypercoagulability intersects with acute illness, treatment, immobility, comorbidities – and, critically, bleeding risk.
The real clinical objective is therefore not simply to prescribe thromboprophylaxis more broadly.
It is to identify the right patient, at the right moment, with an individualized assessment of both thrombosis and bleeding risk.
This work moves us closer to precision thromboprophylaxis: from recognizing cancer as a risk factor to understanding risk within cancer.
Perhaps the most important message is simple:
Risk assessment should not end with the diagnosis of cancer. That is where it should begin.
An important contribution to the evolving field of cancer-associated thrombosis and a valuable reminder that better prediction can ultimately support better prevention.”
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis (JTH) shared a post on LinkedIn, about a recent article by Karlyn A. Martin et al., adding:
“Development and validation of a risk assessment model for hospital-acquired venous thrombosis in medical inpatients with cancer
General clot-risk tools underperform in hospitalized cancer patients. This study built and validated a risk assessment model for hospital-acquired venous thrombosis specific to medical inpatients with cancer, and it outperformed a non-cancer model.
The tool is meant to support individualized decisions about thromboprophylaxis in a group whose bleeding and clotting risks are both elevated.”
Title: Development and validation of a risk assessment model for hospital-acquired venous thrombosis in medical inpatients with cancer
Authors: Karlyn A. Martin, Katherine Wilkinson, Andrew Sparks, Nicholas S. Roetker, Mansour Gergi, Diego Adrianzen Herrera, Jordan K. Schaefer, Ang Li, Radhika Gangaraju, Brian L. Sprague, Chris Holmes, Neil A. Zakai
Other posts featuring Heghine Khachatryan and Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis on Hemostasis Today.
-
Aug 10, 2026, 06:06Mostafa Faisal: What Does High Ferritin Really Mean
-
Aug 10, 2026, 05:45Colin Holburn: Key Laboratory Clues to End Organ Damage
-
Aug 10, 2026, 05:35George Dimitrov: SII and Cancer – What Can This Marker Really Tell Us
-
Aug 10, 2026, 05:01Emicizumab and Breastfeeding New Clinical Evidence – JTH
-
Aug 10, 2026, 04:53Abdulaziz Elnusiry: Pulmonary Embolism – The Silent Emergency We Need to Talk About
-
Aug 10, 2026, 04:33Saba Javed: Managing VTE in Cancer Patients With Thrombocytopenia
-
Aug 10, 2026, 04:09Ney Carter Borges: How Polyphenols Influence Endothelial Function
-
Aug 10, 2026, 03:54Maria Cherska: One Pill, Better Adherence, Same LDL-C Control
-
Aug 10, 2026, 02:41Edward Lee Carter: Can Anticoagulation Be Safely De-Escalated After AF Ablation?