Bartosz Hudzik on Hemocompatibility in HeartMate 3 LVAD: Progress and Persistent Challenges
Bartosz Hudzik, Editorial Consultant at JACC Case Reports, shared on LinkedIn:
”Hemocompatibility in HeartMate 3 LVAD: Progress and Persistent Challenges
The fully magnetically levitated HeartMate 3 (HM3) left ventricular assist device has significantly reduced pump thrombosis and stroke, redefining mechanical circulatory support benchmarks.
However, one important challenge remains:
Non-surgical bleeding continues to be a meaningful source of morbidity, underscoring that even with improved device design, hemocompatibility-related adverse events (HRAEs) are now largely driven by patient factors and anticoagulation quality rather than device malfunction.
Optimizing Anticoagulation Quality to Improve Outcomes in HM3 LVADs — European Heart Journal
Key Insights
- Hemocompatibility progress with HM3
Device innovation has led to a dramatic reduction in pump thrombosis and ischemic stroke, shifting the residual risk profile toward bleeding. - Non-surgical bleeding persists
Despite improved hemocompatibility, bleeding—particularly gastrointestinal and mucosal—remains one of the most common and clinically relevant complications. - Anticoagulation quality is central
Higher time in therapeutic range (TTR) is associated with a lower risk of residual bleeding, reinforcing that how anticoagulation is managed matters just as much as how much is given.
Strategies to Improve the Quality of Anticoagulation
- Maximize Time in Therapeutic Range (TTR)
Stable INR control reduces bleeding without increasing thrombotic risk. - Structured anticoagulation programs
Dedicated LVAD teams and standardized protocols improve consistency. - Frequent INR monitoring and proactive dose adjustment
Prevents large INR swings that drive HRAEs. - Home INR testing and digital health tools
Enable tighter, real-time anticoagulation control. - Patient education and engagement
Diet, adherence, and early symptom reporting all matter.
Take-home message
In the HeartMate 3 era, technology has largely solved pump thrombosis — but bleeding risk now depends on anticoagulation quality.
Increasing TTR is one of the most powerful, modifiable ways to improve outcomes.”

Stay updated with Hemostasis Today.
-
Feb 18, 2026, 16:47Sophia Delicou: Importance of Assessing Hemoglobin Functional Capacity Rather Than Total Levels
-
Feb 18, 2026, 16:32Cheng-Hock Toh: 5 Steps to Transform Transfusion Practice
-
Feb 18, 2026, 16:26Tareq Abadl: CMV and Transfusion – Leukoreduction vs CMV-Seronegative
-
Feb 18, 2026, 16:24Soroush Sohrabi: The Hidden Biology of Sclerotherapy and Mechanisms Beyond Endothelial Injury
-
Feb 18, 2026, 16:23Hamad Abbasi: Why are Coronary Stents so Expensive?
-
Feb 18, 2026, 16:08Carlos Doti: AstraZeneca’s Expanding Impact in Blood Cancer Care
-
Feb 18, 2026, 16:05Shiny K. Kajal: Routine vs Massive Transfusion Protocol
-
Feb 18, 2026, 16:03Maria Farid: Successful Consultative Hematology and Transfusion Medicine Workshop at PKLI
-
Feb 18, 2026, 15:59Ella Lawson: Could Erythritol Harm the Brain’s Blood Vessels?