Jan Sloves: Patterns and Pitfalls Influencing Treatment of Small Saphenous Vein Reflux
Jan Sloves, President and Consultant at Vascular Imaging Professionals LLC, shared a post on LinkedIn about a recent article by Gillian Lee et al, adding:
“Just published in Endovascular Today article by Gillian Lee and Sherry S. on Small Saphenous Vein Reflux.
- SSV disease is common and different: Roughly 10–20% of symptomatic varicose vein patients have SSV incompetence, often older, with fewer visible varices and lower VCSS than classic GSV patients.
- Anatomy drives strategy: An SPJ exists in only nearly 75% of limbs; in ~70% the SSV continues as a cranial extension/intersaphenous vein with multiple drainage patterns into popliteal, thigh perforators, or gluteal veins. If your scan assumes a single straight stump into the popliteal vein, your map is wrong.
- Reflux patterns are complex: Only about half of limbs have combined SPJ + SSV reflux. The rest show various combinations involving cranial extension/ISV, gastrocnemius veins, perforators, and tributaries. Treating “the SSV” without mapping these segments is guesswork.
- Technique matters: Thermal ablation below the gastrocnemius risks sural nerve injury. Tip position at the fascial curve and respect for SPJ type/GV inflow are critical, and NTNT options (cyanoacrylate, microfoam, MOCA) allow safer distal treatment when truly indicated.
When we respect the anatomy, outcomes are excellent. Contemporary series show 89–98% anatomic success and very low clinically significant neuropathy when protocols are followed.
The SSV is not a short straight tube into the popliteal vein; it’s a shape‑shifter with cranial extensions, inter-saphenous connections, gastrocnemius inflow and wildly variable SPJ anatomy.
If your duplex protocol doesn’t deliberately hunt for a high, absent, or rudimentary SPJ, track the cranial extension/Giacomini pathway into the thigh and map how gastrocnemius veins, perforators and tributaries feed the system, then you are not ‘characterizing SSV reflux’ you’re taking a snapshot of one segment and guessing the rest.
For a vein that supplies 10–20% of our symptomatic patients and sits next to the sural and tibial nerves, that level of interrogation is not enough.
Subscribe to the only newsletter built for vascular pros.”
Title: Small Saphenous Vein Reflux: Patterns and Pitfalls Influencing Treatment
Authors: Gillian J. Lee, Sherry D. Scovell
Read the Full Article on Endovascular Today
More posts featuring Jan Sloves on Hemostasis Today.
-
May 24, 2026, 17:48Flora Peyvandi: Crucial Role of Placental ADAMTS13 in Perinatal Survival
-
May 24, 2026, 17:13Mahtab Mashayekhi: The Evolving Role of Red Blood Cell Exchange in the Management of SCD
-
May 24, 2026, 17:12Silvina Graña: Helping Families Better Understand Hemophilia and Daily Life With Bleeding Disorders
-
May 24, 2026, 17:11Miikka Vikkula: Key Insights from the ISSVA 2026 World Congress
-
May 24, 2026, 17:10Mathieu Jackson: Proud to Be Present at This Historic Moment for the Global Bleeding Disorders Community
-
May 24, 2026, 17:09Ramina Fazeli: Highlighting the Emerging Role of Neutrophil Extracellular Traps in Ovarian Cancer
-
May 24, 2026, 16:12William Wallace: Normal B12 Levels May Still Cause Brain Damage and Cognitive Decline
-
May 24, 2026, 15:54Marc Carrier: Ottawa Race Weekend Raised Over 7,000 USD for Thrombosis Canada
-
May 24, 2026, 15:44Janak Sadhu: Building a Stroke-Free Mehsana Through Community Awareness and Healthcare Collaboration