Martin Haluzík Analyzes the Overall Accuracy of Current Available Smartwatches in Identifying AF
Martin Haluzík, Professor of Medicine at Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, shared on LinkedIn about a recent article by Nelson Barrera et al, published in JACC:
”Accuracy of Smartwatches in the Detection of Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Diagnostic Meta-Analysis
Very interesting paper recently published in JACC: Advances by Nelson Barrera and colleagues.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most prevalent arrhythmia and a significant risk factor for stroke and heart disease, making early diagnosis crucial for prevention. Although several smartwatches can detect AF, their accuracy varies, and there is limited information regarding their effectiveness.
The purpose of this study was to analyze the overall accuracy of current available smartwatches in identifying AF.
A comprehensive systematic literature search was performed across major databases for articles published until January 2025.
The specificity, sensitivity, and area under the curve (AUC). Statistical analysis was conducted using R software.
Twenty-six studies were included in the study, including 17,349 patients. Overall sensitivity was 95% (95% CI: 92%-97%; I2 = 95%) and specificity 97% (95% CI: 94%-98%; I2 = 99%), with a pooled AUC of 0.97 (95% CI: 0.96%-0.99%).
Device performance varied, with the Apple Watch achieving 94% sensitivity (95% CI: 89%-96%; I2 = 71%) and 97% specificity (95% CI: 93%-99%; I2 = 87%), Samsung devices yielding 97% sensitivity (95% CI: 92%-99%; I2 = 92%) and 96% specificity (95% CI: 91%-98%; I2 = 92%), and the Withings Scan Watch showing 89% sensitivity (95% CI: 75%-96%; I2 = 94%) and 95% specificity (95% CI: 88%-99%; I2 = 93%).
Accuracy was comparable between photoplethysmography and electrocardiogram-based models.
Smartwatches possess excellent diagnostic accuracy for AF detection and may, therefore, represent a suitable and fitting option for patients.
- Very interesting data
- Overall, impressive specificity and sensitivity.
- Now, the question is, should all patients with high risk of AF wear these devices to detect and treat early?
- I would bet that not only money but also couple of lifes could be saved by this approach
Excellent paper! Congratulations to the authors!”
Title: Accuracy of Smartwatches in the Detection of Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Diagnostic Meta-Analysis
Authors: Nelson Barrera, Maria Solorzano, Yomary Jimenez, Yevhen Kushnir, Francisco Gallegos-Koyner, Guilherme Dagostin de Carvalho
Read the Full Article on JACC
Stay updated on all scientific advances with Hemostasis Today.
-
Nov 9, 2026, 09:29Veronica Sanchez: A Framework for Woman’s Health
-
Nov 8, 2026, 19:31Anna Kajaste-Rudnitski: Presenting AAV-Induced p53 Signalling in Human CNS Cells at ESGCT 26
-
Nov 8, 2026, 19:29David McIntosh: Cybersecurity Matters, but Blood Availability Remains the Bigger Challenge
-
Nov 8, 2026, 19:26Wenxue Ma: An Integrative Framework for Macrophage-Mediated Therapeutic Resistance in Cancer
-
Nov 8, 2026, 19:25Yildiz Yigit: Presenting a Polycythemia Vera Case at the MPN Subcommittee Session
-
Nov 8, 2026, 18:56Denis Oduor: Strengthening the Regulation and Delivery of Blood Transfusion and Transplantation Services
-
Nov 8, 2026, 18:28Raghavendra Rao: A Narrative Review on Chronic Venous Disease during Pregnancy
-
Nov 8, 2026, 17:57Dhiren Patel: PLD1-Derived Phospholipids Regulate NAD Kinase and ROS Production in Neutrophils
-
Nov 8, 2026, 17:48Andra T.: What Causes Antiphospholipid Syndrome? – Four Steps, not One Cause