Usman Ali on The Philosophy of Function of Platelets
Usman Ali, Senior Biomedical Scientist (Haematology) at Barts Health NHS Trust, shared on LinkedIn:
”Platelets and the Philosophy of Function in Biology
In haematology, platelet function is often treated as a technical matter: aggregation curves, agonist responses, thrombin generation.
But beneath these assays lies a deeper philosophical question— what does it mean for platelets to have a function?
Competing Concepts of ”Function”
In philosophy of biology, several frameworks define biological function—and platelets illuminate the tensions between them:
1. Evolutionary (Aetiological) Function
Here, function is defined by what a trait was selected for.
Under this view, platelets exist to prevent haemorrhage.
Aggregation, secretion, and procoagulant activity are merely means to that evolutionary end. Inflammation or thrombosis are side-effects, not functions.
2.Causal-Role Funciton
In contrast, the causal-role view defines function as what a component does within a system.
Platelets then have multiple functions: aggregation, thrombin generation, immune signaling, angiogenesis.
Function becomes plural—and potentially inflated.
3.Normative/Medical Function
Medicine introduces normativity: platelet function is defined by what is appropriate—preventing bleeding without causing thrombosis. Here, both hypo- and hyper-reactivity are dysfunctions. Function is not maximal activity, but regulated balance.
4.Systems Biology Perspective
A more recent synthesis treats platelet function as context-dependent and emergent.
Platelets do not have a single function; rather, they integrate signals under flow to preserve vascular integrity.
Function is relational, not reducible to any single assay.
Why This Matters Experimentally
When we test platelets, we are not merely probing mechanisms—we are implicitly adopting different philosophical definitions of function:
Aggregation assays privilege a mechanical view.
Thrombin generation assays privilege a procoagulant view. Multi-agonist panels reveal functional pluralism.
No single agonist captures “function” in its entirety
This explains why normal aggregation does not always mean normal haemostasis—and why hyperreactive platelets may be both “functional” and pathological.
Platelets challenge a core assumption in biology: that a biological entity has one function.
Instead, they suggest this:
Platelet Function is not a single activity, but a regulated ensemble of casual roles, constrained by context and normativity, aimed at preserving vascular integrity.
In other words, platelet function is not simply what platelets can do—but what they do appropriately.
This is where experimental haematology quietly meets philosophy.”

Stay updated with Hemostasis Today.
-
Feb 23, 2026, 18:13Fight4Hematology Supports Research and Empowers the Next Generation – ASH
-
Feb 23, 2026, 17:59Wolfgang Miesbach: Real-World Evidence of Emicizumab on Joint Outcomes in Hemophilia A
-
Feb 23, 2026, 17:56Shiny K Kajal: The Transfusion Reaction We Often Miss
-
Feb 23, 2026, 17:53Radheshyam Meher: Contributing to the Transfusion Evidence Round-Up for International Childhood Cancer Day 2026
-
Feb 23, 2026, 17:46Mahesan Subramaniam: The Physiological Impact of Anger on Immunity
-
Feb 23, 2026, 17:42Bryan Fry: First Evidence That Bothrops atrox Venom Directly Activates Human Factor VII
-
Feb 23, 2026, 17:34Bastu Odoka: Why Blood Should NOT be Left at the Bedside to ‘Warm’
-
Feb 23, 2026, 17:28Henry Burkitt: Patients Are Challenging How the Medicines Policy System Works in England
-
Feb 23, 2026, 16:50Mutaz Al‑Sabah: Interesting Webinar on FH in Women is Now Available to Watch