Marcos Gamboa Chele: Are We Asking for Too Many Thrombophilia Panels?
Marcos Gamboa Chele, Internal Medicine Specialist, shared a post on LinkedIn about a recent article by Jiwon Shin et al, adding:
”Are we asking for too many thrombophilia panels?
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) affects 1 in 1,000 people worldwide each year. However, the current clinical evidence is clear: universal or routine screening for thrombophilia in all patients with VTE is not recommended.
Based on the recent review ‘Selective Thrombophilia Testing in Venous Thromboembolism’, here is a practical summary of its benefits, limitations, and how to apply it in our daily practice.
Benefits of Selective Testing
In carefully selected patients (unprovoked VTE, younger than 50 years, thrombosis at unusual sites, or strong family history), evaluation offers valuable information for individualized management and prevention of recurrences.
The identification of high-risk conditions, such as Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS) or Antithrombin deficiency, may alter the choice or duration of anticoagulation, justifying indefinite therapies.
It allows for structured genetic and family counseling when serious hereditary defects are confirmed.
Limitations and Challenges
False positives and negatives: Functional assays are highly sensitive to acute phase reaction and the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), which can lead to misleading results.
Ethnic variation: Factor V Leiden and Prothrombin G20210A mutations are common in Western populations, but extremely rare in Asians. In contrast, deficiencies of natural anticoagulants are more significant in the latter populations.
Marginal clinical impact: Discovering a mild hereditary defect rarely alters the management of anticoagulation and has not been shown to improve mortality.
Practical Applicability in the Flat or Consultation
Zero tests in provoked VTE: If the event was triggered by surgery, trauma, or estrogen use, the test has limited diagnostic and therapeutic value.
Time is money: Testing for Protein C, Protein S, and Antithrombin should be postponed until the patient is recovered and 2-6 weeks after stopping blood-thinning therapy.
Lean on genetics: Unlike functional testing, genetic (DNA) testing for specific mutations can be performed at any time, as they are not affected by blood thinners or acute illness.”
Title: Selective Thrombophilia Testing in Venous Thromboembolism
Authors: Jiwon Shin, Hyejee Lee, Hyangkyoung Kim
Read the Full Article on Annals of Phlebology
Stay updated on all scientific advances with Hemostasis Today.
-
Mar 24, 2026, 17:10Anthony Yazbeck: Why the Hemolysin Test Matters More Than You Think
-
Mar 24, 2026, 17:06Anita Brikman: PPTA Explores India’s Growing Plasma-Derived Medicines Industry
-
Mar 24, 2026, 17:01Victor Canata: Is Embolectomy the Best Treatment for Pulmonary Thromboembolism?
-
Mar 24, 2026, 16:57Hossam Qassem: The Stepwise Investigation Framework for ICU Hemoglobin Drop
-
Mar 24, 2026, 16:56Alan Nurden: Targeting Splice Site Variants in Alport Syndrome with Antisense Therapy
-
Mar 24, 2026, 16:53Nibia Gómez Joins the WFH PACT Advocacy Academy
-
Mar 24, 2026, 16:48Join the Webinar on Rehabilitation Nursing in Stroke Care – ASO
-
Mar 24, 2026, 16:47Rob Mac Sweeney: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2026
-
Mar 24, 2026, 16:46Ney Carter Borges: Ticagrelor vs Prasugrel After PCI in Patients With Diabetes and MCAD