Priyansh Shah and Romit Bhattacharya Address Patients’ Concerns on GLP-1
Priyansh Shah, Internal Medicine Resident Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Founder and President at World Youth Heart Federation, shared on LinkedIn:
”Patients often say: ‘GLP-1s feel too new, what about long-term safety?’
This hesitation is common.
But the science behind GLP-1 receptor agonists is anything but new.
New American Journal of Preventive Cardiology article ‘Addressing patient concerns about the ‘newness’ and long-term safety of GLP-1 receptor agonists: A clinician’s guide to counseling’ with Romit Bhattacharya shows how clinicians can reframe this conversation
GLP-1 isn’t a trend, it’s decades old
- Incretin concept: early 1900s
- GLP-1 identified: 1980s
- First GLP-1RA approved: 2005
What feels ‘new’ to patients is actually the product of ~40+ years of research.
These drugs mimic a natural hormone
GLP-1RAs are ~98-99% identical to the GLP-1 your gut releases after meals.
Modern agents (semaglutide, tirzepatide) last longer, not act differently.
This matters for safety.
These aren’t just glucose-lowering drugs
GLP-1RAs show benefits across:
- CV outcomes (SELECT, SUSTAIN-6)
- Kidney disease (FLOW)
- HFpEF (STEP-HFpEF, SUMMIT)
- MASLD/MASH (emerging data)
They’re cardiometabolic therapies.
What about long-term data?
- 70,000 patients in major trials
- Millions treated worldwide
- ~20 years of pharmacovigilance
If major safety signals were there, we’d likely have seen them by now.
Side effects, set expectations early
Most common: nausea, vomiting, diarrhea
- Dose-dependent
- Usually transient
- Improved with slow titration + counseling
- Reassurance plus coaching go a long way.
Feared risks vs evidence
- Pancreatitis → not increased in large analyses
- Pancreatic cancer → no signal in long-term data
- Thyroid cancer → rodent-only MTC signal; not seen in humans
Context matters more than headlines.
Practical counseling checklist
- Explain physiologic mechanism
- Reiterate ~20 year track record
- Normalize GI effects
- Discuss rare risks when relevant
- Review logistics plus follow-up
Shared decisions are better than persuasion.
Bottom line
- GLP-1RAs aren’t experimental shortcuts.
- They’re mature, mechanism-based therapies backed by decades of science and real-world use.
When patients understand this, hesitancy often softens into informed choice.”
Romit Bhattacharya, Associate Director of the Cardiac Lifestyle Program at Massachusetts General Hospital, shared this post on LinkedIn, adding:
”Great Tweetorial from talented resident Priyansh Shah on our recent work published in American Journal of Preventive Cardiology!
GLP counseling in the clinic – how do we contextualize newer medical innovations in the context of their past scientific discoveries and clinical experience?
Check out the article and figures below.
Thanks to Khurram Nasir and Michael Shapiro for their highlighting of this work!”
Title: Addressing patient concerns about the ‘newness’ and long-term safety of GLP-1 receptor agonists: A clinician’s guide to counseling
Authors: Priyansh Shah, Romit Bhattacharya
Read the Full Article on American Journal of Preventive Cardiology

Stay updated on all scientific advances with Hemostasis Today.
-
Aug 14, 2026, 16:39Yuriy Prokopenko: Advancing Hemostasis Through Scientific Collaboration
-
Aug 14, 2026, 16:26Antonio Paul: The Best Transfusion Is the One That Isn’t Needed
-
Aug 14, 2026, 16:24Thirunavukkarasu Angappan: What mRNA Manufacturing Teaches Us About Scaling Hemophilia Gene Therapy
-
Aug 14, 2026, 16:16Priyanka Raheja: Advancing Multidisciplinary Care for Women with Bleeding Disorders
-
Aug 14, 2026, 16:09Cristina Chang: Hemophilia B Gene Therapy BBM-H901 Approved in Macao
-
Aug 14, 2026, 16:03Muhammad Shaheer Bin Faheem: The Growing Mortality Divide in Thromboembolism and Hypertension
-
Aug 14, 2026, 15:53Peter Jaworski: Plasma Donation Myths and Why Plasma Matters
-
Aug 14, 2026, 15:50John Strouse: Why Older Adults with Sickle Cell Disease Should Be Included in Clinical Trials
-
Aug 14, 2026, 15:44Scott Cameron: Understanding Sex Differences in Platelet Biology